Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Community pharmacists' attitudes towards checking prescriptions: a cross-sectional survey.
van Loon, W Ellen; Lambert, Maarten; Heringa, Mette; Bouvy, Marcel L; Taxis, Katja.
Affiliation
  • van Loon WE; Faculty of Science and Engineering, Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economy, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Lambert M; Pharmacy De Drie Stellingen, Brink 1-101, 8431 LD Oosterwolde, The Netherlands.
  • Heringa M; Faculty of Science and Engineering, Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economy, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Bouvy ML; SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Theda Mansholtstraat 5-B, 2331 JE Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Taxis K; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Pharm Pract ; 2024 Jul 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986519
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The final prescription check is a mandatory but time-consuming process in Dutch community pharmacies. A safer dispensing process may have made the final prescription check obsolete.

OBJECTIVE:

To describe the final prescription check in Dutch community pharmacies and explore pharmacists' attitudes towards changing this.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional survey among Dutch community pharmacists. The online questionnaire was based on literature and previous qualitative research, piloted in three pharmacies, and took 10 min to complete. Results were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS:

A total of 409 pharmacists participated. They saw the final prescription check as an important quality assurance of the dispensing process. Nevertheless, most pharmacists agreed that the final prescription check could be optimized as they thought that the time invested outweighed the benefits. Automation of the dispensing process, only checking selected high-risk prescriptions, and more in-process checks could reduce the need for an extensive final prescription check, rather than delegating the task to assistants. To implement changes, most pharmacists felt current dispensing guidelines needed to be adapted.

CONCLUSION:

There was a widespread consensus that optimizing the final prescription check could enhance efficiency and allow more time for person-centred care. Most pharmacists expressed a preference for updated guidelines before implementing such changes.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Int J Pharm Pract Journal subject: FARMACIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Países Bajos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Int J Pharm Pract Journal subject: FARMACIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Países Bajos