Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictors of post-healing recurrence in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sun, Yujian; Zhou, Yue; Dai, Yu; Pan, Yufan; Xiao, Yi; Yu, Yufeng.
Affiliation
  • Sun Y; Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, China. Electronic address: 2269135651@qq.com.
  • Zhou Y; Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, China. Electronic address: 382129146@qq.com.
  • Dai Y; Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, China. Electronic address: 2276529647@qq.com.
  • Pan Y; Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, China. Electronic address: 1578006254@qq.com.
  • Xiao Y; Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, China. Electronic address: 878949496@qq.com.
  • Yu Y; Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, China. Electronic address: 1393109559@qq.com.
J Tissue Viability ; 2024 Jul 13.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39004600
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Diabetic foot ulcer is one of the most prevalent, serious, and costly consequences of diabetes, often associated with peripheral neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease. These ulcers contribute to high disability and mortality rates in patients and pose a major challenge to clinical management.

OBJECTIVE:

To systematically review the risk prediction models for post-healing recurrence in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients, so as to provide a reference for clinical staff to choose appropriate prediction models.

METHODS:

The authors searched five databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Chinese Biomedical Database) from their inception to September 23, 2023, for relevant literature. After data extraction, the quality of the literature was evaluated using the Predictive Model Research Bias Risk and Suitability Assessment tool (PROBAST). Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 software.

RESULTS:

A total of 9 studies involving 5956 patients were included. The recurrence rate after DFU healing ranged from 6.2 % to 41.4 %. Nine studies established 15 risk prediction models, and the area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.660 to 0.940, of which 12 models had an AUC≥0.7, indicating good prediction performance. The combined AUC value of the 9 validation models was 0.83 (95 % confidence interval 0.79-0.88). Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed for 10 models, external validation for 5 models, and internal validation for 6 models. Meta-analysis showed that 14 predictors, such as age and living alone, could predict post-healing recurrence in DFU patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

To enhance the quality of these risk prediction models, there is potential for future improvements in terms of follow-up duration, model calibration, and validation processes.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Tissue Viability Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / FISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Tissue Viability Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / FISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article