Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of National Centralized Drug Procurement policy on chemical pharmaceutical enterprises' R&D investment: a difference-in-differences analysis in China.
Li, Jiaming; Zhang, Xinyue; Wang, Rui; Cao, Keyao; Wan, Luhui; Ren, Xu; Ding, Jinxi; Li, Wei.
Affiliation
  • Li J; School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Zhang X; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Xinhua Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.
  • Wang R; School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Cao K; School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Wan L; School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Ren X; School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Ding J; School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Li W; Pharmaceutical Market Access Policy Research Center, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1402581, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39011324
ABSTRACT

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the National Centralized Drug Procurement (NCDP) policy on chemical pharmaceutical enterprises' R&D investment and provide references for improving NCDP policy design and encouraging innovation in the pharmaceutical industry.

Methods:

Using the panel data of 102 Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed enterprises from 2016 to 2022 under the chemical pharmaceutical classification of Shenwan in Wind database as the research sample, this study developed difference-in-differences (DID) models on bid-winning and bid-non-winning enterprises, respectively, to evaluate the impact of NCDP policy on their R&D investment. In addition, this study tested the heterogeneity of bid-winning enterprises based on the bid success rate, the decline of drug price, and enterprise size.

Results:

The NCDP policy could encourage chemical pharmaceutical companies to increase R&D investment, but the low bid success rate and excessive drug price reduction would reduce their R&D enthusiasm, especially for small- and medium-sized enterprises.

Discussion:

It is suggested that the NCDP policy should be further improved first, revise the bidding rule of the NCDP policy and increase the bid success rate so that more enterprises can win bids, and second, to solve the problem of excessive drug price reduction, evaluate the rationality of bid-winning prices, and introduce a two-way selection mechanism between medical institutions and supply enterprises. Integrate pharmacoeconomic evaluation into the NCDP rules to form a benign competition among enterprises. Third, attention should be paid to supporting policies for small- and medium-sized enterprises. By increasing procurement volume, shortening payment time limits, and increasing the proportion of advance payments, enterprises' cash flow shortages can be alleviated, thus achieving fairness and inclusiveness in the implementation of the NCDP policy.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Drug Industry Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Front Public Health Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Drug Industry Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Front Public Health Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China