Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Augmentation genioplasty using discarded bone fragments following proximal segment osteotomy of the ramus in intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO).
Kang, Sang-Hoon; Lee, Chan-Young; Jun, Taek-Geun; Kang, Min-Jun.
Affiliation
  • Kang SH; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, 100 Ilsan-Ro, Ilsan-Donggu, Goyang, Gyeonggi-Do, 10444, Republic of Korea. omskang@nhimc.or.kr.
  • Lee CY; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, 100 Ilsan-Ro, Ilsan-Donggu, Goyang, Gyeonggi-Do, 10444, Republic of Korea.
  • Jun TG; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, 100 Ilsan-Ro, Ilsan-Donggu, Goyang, Gyeonggi-Do, 10444, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang MJ; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 211 Eonju-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea.
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg ; 46(1): 27, 2024 Jul 19.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028530
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Based on a three-dimensional (3D) orthognathic simulation, this technical report introduces a method for augmentation genioplasty using a proximal bone fragment of the mandible, which is typically discarded in intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO).

RESULTS:

A 43-year-old female patient diagnosed with Class III malocclusion, presenting with a protruding mandible and long facial height, underwent surgical treatment. The surgical plan involved mandibular setback position using IVRO and augmentation genioplasty. The 3D orthognathic surgery including augmentation genioplasty simulation was performed. An excessively elongated proximal segment was sectioned following IVRO. The inferior part of the sectioned proximal bone fragment of the mandible was positioned to align with the requirements of advancement genioplasty. After ensuring that the placement of the fragment matched that of the simulated surgery, each bone fragment was fixed. At 1.5 years post-surgery, the grafted bone on the augmentation genioplasty was well maintained, with slight bone resorption.

CONCLUSIONS:

Augmentation genioplasty using the proximal bone fragment of the mandible, which is typically discarded in IVRO, reduces the surgical complications associated with chin osteotomy. When a secondary genioplasty is required, genioplasty with osteotomy, movement of the cut bone fragments, partial bone-shaving osteotomy, and additional bone grafting are viable options.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Reino Unido