Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Synergistic implications of combinatorial rehabilitation approaches using spinal stimulation on therapeutic outcomes in spinal cord injury.
Scheffler, Michelle S; Martin, Catherine A; Dietz, Valerie; Faraji, Amir H; Sayenko, Dimitry G.
Affiliation
  • Scheffler MS; Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Martin CA; Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Dietz V; Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Faraji AH; Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Sayenko DG; Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Electronic address: dgsayenko@houstonmethodist.org.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 165: 166-179, 2024 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033698
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this narrative review was to locate and assess recent articles employing a combinatorial approach of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation or epidural spinal cord stimulation with additional modalities. We sought to provide relevant knowledge of recent literature and advance understanding on outcomes reported, to better equip those working in neurorehabilitation and neuromodulation.

METHODS:

Articles were selected and analyzed based on study approach, stimulation parameters, outcome measures, and presence of neurophysiological data to support findings.

RESULTS:

This narrative review analyzed 44 recent articles employing a combinatorial approach of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation or epidural spinal cord stimulation with additional modalities. Our findings showed that limited research exists regarding such combinatorial approaches, particularly when considering modalities beyond activity-based training. There is also limited consistency in neurophysiological and quality of life outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

Articles involving transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation or epidural spinal cord stimulation with other modalities are limited in the current body of literature. Authors noted variety in approach, sample size, and use of participant perspective. Opportunities are present to add high quality research to this body of literature.

SIGNIFICANCE:

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and epidural spinal cord stimulation are emerging in research as viable avenues for targeting improvement of function after traumatic spinal cord injury, particularly when combined with activity-based training. This body of literature demonstrates viable areas for growth from both neurophysiological and functional perspectives. Further, exploration of novel combinatorial approaches holds potential to offer enhanced contributions to clinical and neurophysiological rehabilitation and research.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Cord Injuries / Spinal Cord Stimulation Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Cord Injuries / Spinal Cord Stimulation Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos