Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of rebubbling rate between preloaded endothelium-in and preloaded no-touch endothelium-out Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty transplantation.
Kronschläger, Martin; Ruzza, Alessandro; Zeilinger, Johannes; Schlatter, Andreas; Ruiss, Manuel; Findl, Oliver.
Affiliation
  • Kronschläger M; Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Heinrich Collin Strasse 30, Vienna, 1140, Austria. martin.kronschlaeger@gmx.at.
  • Ruzza A; Fondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto, ETS, Via Paccagnella n. 11 - Padiglione Rama, Zelarino, Venice, 30174, Italy.
  • Zeilinger J; Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Heinrich Collin Strasse 30, Vienna, 1140, Austria.
  • Schlatter A; Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Heinrich Collin Strasse 30, Vienna, 1140, Austria.
  • Ruiss M; Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Heinrich Collin Strasse 30, Vienna, 1140, Austria.
  • Findl O; Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Heinrich Collin Strasse 30, Vienna, 1140, Austria.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 24(1): 301, 2024 Jul 22.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39039569
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To compare the difference in rebubbling rates between patients undergoing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with endothelium-in using a standard IOL cartridge and those with endothelium-out DMEK utilizing a no-touch technique with borosilicate glass cartridge transplantation.

METHODS:

This retrospective study included all eyes that underwent preloaded endothelium-in or endothelium-out DMEK transplantation from June 2019 to December 2023 at the Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria. All DMEKs were harvested, prepared and preloaded at the European Eye Bank of Venice, Italy. DMEK surgeries were done by one experienced surgeon and the procedure was completed by air tamponade of the anterior chamber.

RESULTS:

Overall, 32 eyes each of 31 endothelium-out patients and of 29 endothelium-in patients were included. 32 preloaded endothelium-in procedures were followed by 32 preloaded endothelium-out procedures. Rebubbling rate for endothelium-in was 15/32 (47%) and for endothelium-out was 7/25 (28%) (p = 0.035, Pearson's chi-squared test). Donor age was the most important variable for rebubbling in a random forest algorithm model (ROC 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS:

Rebubbling rate in endothelium-out DMEK was less than two-thirds compared to endothelium-in DMEK favoring no-touch endothelium-out DMEK as the preferred technique of DMEK transplantation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Endothelium, Corneal / Visual Acuity / Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Journal subject: OFTALMOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Austria Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Endothelium, Corneal / Visual Acuity / Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Journal subject: OFTALMOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Austria Country of publication: Reino Unido