Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The influence of socioeconomic disadvantage on short- and long-term outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer: an Australian multicentre study.
Park, Jin-Soo; Polikarpova, Aleksandra; Leibman, Steven; Laurence, Jerome M; Smith, Garett; Falk, Gregory L; Sandroussi, Charbel.
Affiliation
  • Park JS; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Polikarpova A; RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Leibman S; School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Laurence JM; School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Smith G; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Falk GL; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Sandroussi C; School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
ANZ J Surg ; 94(10): 1723-1731, 2024 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39041601
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Socioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role of socioeconomic disadvantage on outcomes following oesophagectomy for cancer. This study assessed whether SES was associated with short-term perioperative morbidity, long-term survival, and oncological outcomes following oesophagectomy across three tertiary oesophageal cancer centres in Australia.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was performed comprising all patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer across three Australian centres. Patients were stratified into SES groups using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). Outcomes measured included perioperative complication rates, overall survival, and disease-free survival.

RESULTS:

The study cohort was 462 patients, 205 in the lower SES and 257 in the higher SES groups. The lower SES group presented with more advanced oesophageal cancer stage, a higher rate of T3 (52.6% versus 42.7%, P = 0.038) and N2 disease (19.6% versus 10.5%, P = 0.006), and had a higher rate of readmission within 30 days (11.2% versus 5.4%, P = 0.023). There was no difference in overall survival or disease-free survival between groups.

CONCLUSION:

Lower socioeconomic status was associated with more advanced stage and increased risk of early, unplanned readmission following oesophagectomy, but was not associated with a difference in overall or disease-free survival.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Esophagectomy Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: ANZ J Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Esophagectomy Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: ANZ J Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Australia