Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modeling package size-conscious automated dispensing cabinet replenishment to improve efficiency.
Rodgers, John Killian L; Braun, Randy; Rowe, Erinn; Kruszewski, Kristen M; Colmenares, Evan W.
Affiliation
  • Rodgers JKL; UNC Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Braun R; UNC Health, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Rowe E; UNC Health, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Kruszewski KM; Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
  • Colmenares EW; UNC Health, Morrisville, NC, USA.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044284
ABSTRACT
DISCLAIMER In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE:

Optimization of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) has traditionally focused on modifying the inventory within these devices and ignored the replenishment process itself. Rounding replenishment quantities to the nearest package size, termed package size-conscious replenishment (PSCR), was investigated as a way to optimize labor needs for ADC replenishment.

METHODS:

A simulation of PSCR for a subset of medications stocked in ADCs at the University of North Carolina Medical Center was conducted. The simulation utilized real-world vend data and rounding factors to model the impact of PSCR on key ADC metrics. The final simulation utilized 2 months of ADC transactions across 410 medications in 149 ADCs. Four replenishment methodologies were simulated standard replenishment and 3 PSCR strategies, including rounding down, rounding any direction, and rounding up.

RESULTS:

All 3 PSCR methodologies had significantly lower stockout frequencies than standard replenishment at 0.722% (P = 0.026) for rounding down, 0.698% (P = 0.024) for rounding any direction, and 0.680% (P = 0.024) for rounding up vs 0.773% for standard replenishment. PSCR methods were associated with significant time savings for both technician and pharmacist activities (P < 0.001 for all 3 strategies), with a savings of up to 0.27 technician and 0.52 pharmacist full-time equivalents estimated for the rounding-up methodology. Maximum carrying cost was higher for all 3 PSCR methodologies.

CONCLUSION:

PSCR was modeled to significantly decrease both pharmacist and technician time needed to replenish ADCs while also decreasing stockout frequency. Modest increases in maximum carrying cost were also shown. The simulation created for this evaluation could also be utilized to model other components of the ADC replenishment process.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Journal subject: FARMACIA / HOSPITAIS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Journal subject: FARMACIA / HOSPITAIS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Reino Unido