Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inequitable Distribution of Global Economic Benefits from Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccination.
Niyibitegeka, Fulgence; Russell, Fiona M; Jit, Mark; Carvalho, Natalie.
Affiliation
  • Niyibitegeka F; Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.
  • Russell FM; Asia-Pacific Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.
  • Jit M; Centre for International Child Health, Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
  • Carvalho N; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(7)2024 Jul 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39066405
ABSTRACT
Many low- and middle-income countries have been slow to introduce the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) into their routine childhood immunization schedules despite a high burden of disease. We estimated the global economic surplus of PCV, defined as the sum of the net value to 194 countries (i.e., monetized health benefits minus net costs) and to vaccine manufacturers (i.e., profits). We further explored the distribution of global economic surplus across country income groups and manufacturers and the effect of different pricing strategies based on cross-subsidization, pooled procurement, and various tiered pricing mechanisms. We found that current PCV pricing policies disproportionately benefit high-income countries and manufacturers. Based on the 2021 birth cohort, high-income countries and manufacturers combined received 76.5% of the net economic benefits generated by the vaccine. Over the two decades of PCV availability, low- and middle-income countries have not received the full economic benefits of PCV. Cross-subsidization of the vaccine price for low- and middle-income countries and pooled procurement policies that would relate the vaccine price to the value of economic benefits generated for each country could reduce these inequalities. This analysis offers important considerations that may improve the equitable introduction and use of new and under-utilized vaccines.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Vaccines (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Suiza

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Vaccines (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Suiza