Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding Clinician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Relating to Nonpharmaceutical Fentanyl and Harm Reduction.
Whitney, Elena; Weyer, George; Perri, Molly; Dickson, Sarah; Kerins, Angela; Landi, Andrea Justine; Moore, P Quincy; Murray, John P; Pucci, Geoff; Ari, Mim.
Affiliation
  • Whitney E; Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Weyer G; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Perri M; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Dickson S; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Kerins A; Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Landi AJ; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Moore PQ; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Murray JP; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Pucci G; Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Ari M; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Subst Use Addctn J ; : 29767342241266421, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39087695
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Nonpharmaceutical fentanyl (NPF) is driving the national epidemic of opioid overdose deaths. Clinicians can play a role in fostering awareness of this growing risk and delivering interventions to reduce mortality. However, there is limited research assessing clinician knowledge, attitudes, and practices relating to NPF and harm reduction strategies.

METHODS:

A 34-question survey was designed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to NPF and harm reduction strategies of adult and pediatric hospital-based and emergency clinicians at a single academic medical center. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics. Chi square and Fishers exact tests were used to compare groups.

RESULTS:

There were 136 survey responses. The majority (88%) of respondents correctly answered a question on NPF potency. Most respondents were aware that NPF exposure was very (84%) or somewhat likely (10%) for someone using illicit opioids and very (44%) or somewhat likely (46%) for nonopioid drugs. Respondents viewed overdose prevention as highly important for patients using illicit opioids (93%) and nonopioid drugs (86%) but few (21%) were very/extremely familiar with overdose prevention strategies and just over half (57%) were comfortable/very comfortable counseling about overdose prevention. There was wide variability in utilization of harm reduction/treatment strategies (7.3% frequently providing fentanyl test kits to 70% frequently prescribing naloxone). Higher levels of comfort and familiarity with overdose prevention were associated with more frequent counseling on harm reduction strategies. Pediatric-only clinicians had less familiarity (5% very/extremely familiar) and comfort (35% comfortable/very comfortable) with overdose prevention, and limited use of harm reduction strategies (0%-31% using each strategy frequently).

CONCLUSIONS:

While clinicians had knowledge and awareness of NPF and rated overdose prevention as highly important, utilization of harm reduction and treatment strategies was variable. This study highlights opportunities for education and system-based support to improve clinician-driven harm reduction practices for patients at risk of overdose.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Subst Use Addctn J Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Subst Use Addctn J Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos