Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Evaluation of the Mechanical and Physical Properties of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate vs. Bacterial Cellulose Nanocrystal-Reinforced Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: An In Vitro Study.
V, Lalitha Priya; Ramar, Kavitha.
Affiliation
  • V LP; Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.
  • Ramar K; Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.
Cureus ; 16(7): e63632, 2024 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39092330
ABSTRACT

AIM:

This study aims to compare and assess the compression strength, microhardness, and surface texture of two sets of materials mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) PlusTM and bacterial cellulose nanocrystal (BCNC)-reinforced MTA PlusTM. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

According to the ASTM E384 standard, the cylindrical molds made of plexiglass with an internal diameter of 6 mm and a height of 4 mm were fabricated using computer numerical control laser cutting. A total of 20 samples (n=10) in each group were considered in this experimental study Group I (control group) MTA PlusTM (Prevest DenPro Limited, India) and Group II (experimental group) BCNC (Vedayukt India Private Limited, India)-reinforced MTA PlusTM. After preparation, the molds were incubated at 37°C in a fully saturated condition for about 24 hours, and then the compression strength, microhardness, and scanning electron microscopy analyses were performed at different magnifications. The obtained data were then statistically analyzed.

RESULTS:

Quantitative analysis revealed that there is a statistically significant difference between MTA PlusTM and BCNC-reinforced MTA PlusTM  (p<0.002). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U-test revealed that BCNC-reinforced MTA PlusTM  showed significantly higher compression strength (33.80±3.83 MPa, p=0.00) and surface microhardness (642.85±24.00 µm, p=0.00) than the control group.

CONCLUSION:

Based on our findings, it was concluded that there is a statistically significant difference between both study groups. Thus, incorporating BCNC into the MTA PlusTM  significantly increased the compression strength and surface microhardness of the MTA PlusTM cement. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

Numerous dental applications have been investigated for bacterial cellulose. Many benefits of bacterial cellulose are available, which include its effects on moldability, low cost, high water retention capacity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. Furthermore, the addition of BCNC to MTA PlusTM  accelerates the material's hardening process and decreases its setting time, which in turn shortens clinical chairside procedural timing and thereby improves patient satisfaction.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cureus Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cureus Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos