Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Final Analysis of a Noninterventional Study on Cabozantinib in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy of the German Interdisciplinary Working Group on Renal Tumors (IAG-N).
Viktor, Grünwald; Martin, Bögemann; Mohammad-Reza, Rafiyan; Günter, Niegisch; Marco, Schnabel; Anne, Flörcken; Michael, Maasberg; Christoph, Maintz; Mark-Oliver, Zahn; Anke, Wortmann; Andreas, Hinkel; Jochen, Casper; C, Darr; Thomas, Hilser; M, Schulze; Disorn, Sookthai; Philipp, Ivanyi.
Affiliation
  • Viktor G; Wetsdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen (AöR), Essen, Germany; Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum Essen, Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR), Essen, Germany. Electronic address: viktor.gruenwald@uk-essen.de.
  • Martin B; Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Mohammad-Reza R; Krankenhaus Nordwest gGmbH, Institut für Klinisch-Onkologische Forschung (IKF), Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Günter N; Klinik für Urologie, Konservative Urologische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO) Düsseldorf, CIO Aachen, Bonn, Köln, Düsseldorf.
  • Marco S; Klinik für Urologie der Universität Regensburg am Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Anne F; Medizinische Klinik m.S. Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
  • Michael M; Institut für Versorgungsforschung, Mayen, Germany.
  • Christoph M; MVZ West GmbH Würselen, Würselen, Germany.
  • Mark-Oliver Z; MVZ Onkologische Kooperation Harz, Goslar, Germany.
  • Anke W; Onkologiezentrum Soest-Iserlohn, Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Kloster Paradiese GbR, Soest-Paradiese, Germany.
  • Andreas H; Department for Urology, Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld, Onkologisches Zentrum, Bielefeld, Germany.
  • Jochen C; Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin - Onkologie und Hämatologie, Oldenburg, Germany.
  • C D; Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum Essen, Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR), Essen, Germany.
  • Thomas H; Wetsdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen (AöR), Essen, Germany.
  • M S; Praxis Dr. Schulze, Markkleeberg, Germany.
  • Disorn S; Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF GmbH, Krankenhaus Nordwest GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Philipp I; Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Hämatologie, Hämostaseologie, Onkologie und Stammzelltransplantation, Hannover, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Hannover; Germany.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(5): 102159, 2024 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39095295
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Efficacy of treatment after failure of check point inhibitors (ICI) therapy remains ill-defined in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cabozantinib after failure of ICI-based therapies. DESIGN, SETTING AND

PARTICIPANTS:

Patients with mRCC who concluded cabozantinib treatment directly after an ICI-based therapy were eligible. Data was collected retrospectively from participating sites in Germany.

INTERVENTIONS:

Cabozantinib was administered as a standard of care. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL

ANALYSIS:

Adverse events (AE) were reported according to CTCAE v5.0. Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 and Progression Free Survival (PFS) were collected from medical records. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meyer-plots were utilized. RESULTS AND

LIMITATIONS:

About 56 eligible patients (71.4% male) with median age of 66 years and clear cell histology in 66.1% (n = 37) were analyzed. 87.5% (n = 49) had ≥ 2 previous lines. IMDC risk was intermediate or poor in 17 patients (30.4%) and missing in 66.1%. 20 patients (35.7%) started with 60 mg. 55.4% (n = 31) required dose reductions, 26.8% (n = 15) treatment delays and 1.8% (n = 1) treatment discontinuation. Partial response was reported in 10.7% (n = 6), stable and progressive disease were reported in 19.6% (n = 11) and in 12.5% (n = 7). 32 patients were not evaluable (57.1%). Median treatment duration was 6.1 months. Treatment related AE were reported in 76.8% (n = 43) and 19.6% (n = 11) had grade 3-5. Fatigue (26.8%), diarrhea (26.8%) and hand-foot-syndrome (25.0%) were the 3 most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. SAE were reported in 21.4% (n = 12), 2 were fatal. Major limitation was the retrospective data capture in our study.

CONCLUSIONS:

Cabozantinib followed directly after ICI-based therapy was safe and feasible. No new safety signals were reported. A lower starting dose was frequently utilized in this real-world cohort, which was associated with a favorable tolerability profile. Our data supports the use of cabozantinib after ICI treatment.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pyridines / Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Kidney Neoplasms / Anilides Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pyridines / Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Kidney Neoplasms / Anilides Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos