Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of prostatic ductal cancer.
Huang, Haijun; Zou, Sijuan; Wan, Jie; Zeng, Xing; Wang, Shaogang; Hu, Zhiquan; Zhu, Xiaohua; Yang, Chunguang.
Affiliation
  • Huang H; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Zou S; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Wan J; Department of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Zeng X; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Wang S; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Hu Z; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. Electronic address: huzhiquan2000@163.com.
  • Zhu X; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. Electronic address: evazhu@vip.sina.com.
  • Yang C; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. Electronic address: cgyang-hust@hotmail.com.
Urol Oncol ; 2024 Aug 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39098476
ABSTRACT

PURPOSES:

To explore the characteristics of PSMA PET/CT and FDG PET/CT images in prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DA) patients.

METHODS:

We retrospectively enrolled prostatic DA patients with PET/CT scans at Tongji Hospital from 2018 to 2022. Patients with prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma (AA) and benign pathology (BP) were enrolled by 11 matching. Differences in the uptake of primary and metastatic foci on PET among the groups were analyzed.

RESULTS:

A total of 42 patients were enrolled 14 in each group. In primary foci, the mean PSMA uptake in the DA group was lower than that in the AA group (14.2 ± 9.6 vs. 27.1 ± 14.3, P = 0.009) and greater than that in the BP group (14.2 ± 9.6 vs. 4.7 ± 1.3, P = 0.003). The AUCs of the DA-AA ROC curve and DA-BP ROC curve were 0.781 and 0.872, respectively. The median PSMA uptake of metastatic lymph nodes in the DA group was lower than that in the AA group (5.6 vs. 14.2, P = 0.033), with no significant difference in metastatic bone lesions (9.5 vs 19.1, P = 0.485). No significant difference was found in the FDG uptake of primary and metastatic foci between the DA and AA groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Prostatic DA has greater PSMA uptake than BP diseases, but lower uptake in both primary foci and metastatic lymph nodes than AA on PSMA PET/CT, aiding in the differential diagnosis of DA, AA and BP diseases. Clinicians should combine traditional imaging with PSMA PET/CT to avoid underestimating the clinical stage of DA patients.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Urol Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Urol Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China