Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Views and preferences of food-insecure pregnant women regarding food insecurity screening and support within routine antenatal care.
Zinga, Julia; van der Pligt, Paige; McKay, Fiona H.
Affiliation
  • Zinga J; School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • van der Pligt P; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • McKay FH; School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Health Expect ; 27(1): e13956, 2024 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39102650
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Food insecurity is a public health concern that has profound impact on physical and mental health, and on social well-being. Pregnancy is a period in which food insecurity is likely to be particularly deleterious, due to the serious impact on both mother and child. Food insecurity is not routinely screened in antenatal healthcare settings, and the preferences of pregnant women regarding food insecurity screening and support are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the views and preferences of food-insecure pregnant women regarding food insecurity screening and support within antenatal healthcare.

METHODS:

This qualitative descriptive study used face-to-face semi-structured interviews, conducted in February and March 2023, to gain the views of purposively sampled food-insecure, pregnant women in Melbourne, Australia. Food insecurity was evidenced by an affirmative response to at least one of three assessment items in a screening questionnaire. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to summarise the views and preferences of women.

RESULTS:

Nineteen food-insecure pregnant women were interviewed. Three themes were identified (1) acceptability of being screened for food insecurity, (2) concerns about the consequences of disclosure and (3) preferences regarding food insecurity screening and supportive strategies that could be offered within an antenatal healthcare setting.

CONCLUSION:

Women were accepting of food insecurity screening being conducted within routine healthcare. Women identified potential benefits of routine screening, such as feeling supported by their clinician to have a healthy pregnancy and less pressure to voluntarily ask for food assistance. Women gave suggestions for the implementation of food insecurity screening to optimise their healthcare experience, maintain their dignity and feel able to disclose within a safe and caring environment. These results indicate that food insecurity screening in the antenatal setting is likely to have support from pregnant women and is urgently needed in the interest of promoting optimal nutrition for women and children. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION Pregnant women with lived experience of food insecurity were purposively sampled to obtain their insights regarding screening and support within a pregnancy healthcare setting. Member-checking occurred following data collection, whereby all participants were offered the opportunity to review their interview transcript to ensure trustworthiness of the data.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prenatal Care / Qualitative Research / Pregnant Women / Food Insecurity Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Health Expect Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prenatal Care / Qualitative Research / Pregnant Women / Food Insecurity Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Health Expect Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Reino Unido