Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
SLFN11 and ATR as targets for overcoming cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells.
König, Philipp; Eichhorn, Julia Maria; Suparman, Eloy; Bückreiß, Nico; Cinatl, Jindrich; Michaelis, Martin; Bendas, Gerd.
Affiliation
  • König P; Department of Pharmacy, University Bonn, 53121 Bonn, Germany.
  • Eichhorn JM; Department of Pharmacy, University Bonn, 53121 Bonn, Germany.
  • Suparman E; Department of Pharmacy, University Bonn, 53121 Bonn, Germany.
  • Bückreiß N; Department of Pharmacy, University Bonn, 53121 Bonn, Germany.
  • Cinatl J; Institute of Medical Virology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Interdisciplinary Laboratory for Paediatric Tumour and Virus Research, Dr. Petra Joh Research Institute, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Michaelis M; Interdisciplinary Laboratory for Paediatric Tumour and Virus Research, Dr. Petra Joh Research Institute, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; School of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, UK.
  • Bendas G; Department of Pharmacy, University Bonn, 53121 Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: gbendas@uni-bonn.de.
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis ; 1870(8): 167448, 2024 Aug 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39117290
ABSTRACT
The levels and activities of the DNA/RNA helicase schlafen11 (SLFN11) and the serine/threonine-protein kinase ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) may determine cancer cell sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, including platinum drugs. Here, we studied the roles of SLFN11 and ATR in cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer using cell lines displaying acquired or intrinsic cisplatin resistance. W1CR, the cisplatin-resistant subline of W1 ovarian cancer cells, displayed reduced SLFN11 levels. HDAC inhibition using entinostat returned an epigenetic downregulation of SLFN11 in W1CR cells, caused SLFN11 re-expression and re-sensitized these cells to cisplatin. Moreover, entinostat also sensitized intrinsically resistant EFO21 ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin by upregulating SLFN11. However, SLFN11 was not involved in cisplatin resistance in all other cell models. Thus, SLFN11 expression is not a general cisplatin resistance marker in ovarian cancer. In contrast, inhibition of the DNA damage repair master regulator ATR using sub-toxic concentrations of elimusertib sensitized parental cell lines as well as intrinsically resistant EFO21 cells to cisplatin, and fully reversed acquired cisplatin resistance in cisplatin-adapted sublines W1CR, A2780cis, and KuramochirCDDP2000. Mechanisms underlying ATR-mediated cisplatin resistance differed between the cell lines and included CHK1/WEE1 signaling and induction of homologous recombination. In conclusion, SLFN11 and ATR are involved in ovarian cancer cisplatin resistance. Although our data identify ATR as key target for tackling cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer, future studies are needed to identify biomarkers that indicate, which individual ovarian cancers benefit from SLFN11 re-activation and/or ATR inhibition.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Alemania Country of publication: Países Bajos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Alemania Country of publication: Países Bajos