Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of relationship factors on antenatal depression in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Pekarsky, Chloe; Skiffington, Janice; Chaput, Kathleen; Slater, Donna; Leijser, Lara M; Metcalfe, Amy.
Affiliation
  • Pekarsky C; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Skiffington J; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Chaput K; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Slater D; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Leijser LM; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Metcalfe A; Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Birth ; 2024 Aug 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39133551
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Antenatal depression is the most prevalent pregnancy-associated mental health disorder. Previous studies have identified several risk factors for antenatal depression, including partner support. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many relationship dynamics changed. This study examined the extent to which relationship factors had an impact on antenatal depression in comparison with other well-researched factors in the context of the pandemic.

METHODS:

A secondary analysis was conducted using data from the P3 Cohort in Calgary, a longitudinal cohort study based in Alberta, Canada. Pregnant people (n = 872) completed self-report questionnaires and validated scales about sociodemographic, psychological, and relationship characteristics. Antenatal depression was assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Logistic regression was used to assess the impact of reported characteristics on antenatal depression. Tests of model fit were used to examine whether the inclusion of variables related to relationship quality improved model fit after accounting for other known risk factors.

RESULTS:

Overall, 18.23% of participants experienced antenatal depression. Relationship factors including relationship unhappiness (OR = 1.98 [95% CI 1.06-3.69]), having an upsetting partner (OR = 2.00 [95% CI 1.17-3.40]), and having a lower quality of relationships with close friends and family (OR = 1.76 [95% CI 1.14-2.73]) were associated with antenatal depression; however, inclusion of these relationship factors did not improve model fit after accounting for other known predictors.

CONCLUSION:

Overall, relationship factors were not associated with antenatal depression during the pandemic after accounting for other known risk factors. Stress and anxiety caused by the pandemic may have overshadowed the impact of relationship factors, or relationship factors may have contributed to higher levels of stress and anxiety more generally within our sample.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Birth Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Birth Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá