Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adverse events and perceived abandonment: learning from patients' accounts of medical mishaps.
Schlesinger, Mark; Dhingra, Isha; Fain, Barbara A; Prentice, Julia C; Parkash, Vinita.
Affiliation
  • Schlesinger M; Yale University Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Dhingra I; Yale University Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA ishadhingraconsulting@gmail.com.
  • Fain BA; Betsy Lehman Center for Patient Safety, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Prentice JC; Betsy Lehman Center for Patient Safety, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Parkash V; Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
BMJ Open Qual ; 13(3)2024 Aug 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39147403
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Adverse medical events affect 10% of American households annually, inducing a variety of harms and attitudinal changes. The impact of adverse events on perceived abandonment by patients and their care partners has not been methodically assessed.

OBJECTIVE:

To identify ways in which providers, patients and families responded to medical mishaps, linking these qualitatively and statistically to reported feelings of abandonment and sequelae induced by perceived abandonment.

METHODS:

Mixed-methods analysis of responses to the Massachusetts Medical Errors Recontact survey with participants reporting a medical error within the past 5 years. The survey consisted of forty closed and open-ended questions examining adverse medical events and their consequences. Respondents were asked whether they felt 'that the doctors abandoned or betrayed you or your family'. Open-ended responses were analysed with a coding schema by two clinician coders.

RESULTS:

Of the 253 respondents, 34.5% initially and 20% persistently experienced abandonment. Perceived abandonment could be traced to interactions before (18%), during (34%) and after (45%) the medical mishap. Comprehensive post-incident communication reduced abandonment for patients staying with the provider associated with the mishap. However, 68.4% of patients perceiving abandonment left their original provider; for them, post-error communication did not increase the probability of resolution. Abandonment accounted for half the post-event loss of trust in clinicians.

LIMITATIONS:

Survey-based data may under-report the impact of perceived errors on vulnerable populations. Moreover, patients may not be cognizant of all forms of adverse events or all sequelae to those events. Our data were drawn from a single state and time period.

CONCLUSION:

Addressing the deleterious impact of persisting abandonment merits attention in programmes responding to patient safety concerns. Enhancing patient engagement in the aftermath of an adverse medical event has the potential to reinforce therapeutic alliances between patients and their subsequent clinicians.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Medical Errors Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Qual Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Medical Errors Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Qual Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Reino Unido