Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lipid Control and Medical Costs Among Patients With and Without Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Followed in a Brazilian Private Healthcare System.
de Barros E Silva, Pedro Gabriel Melo; Szneider, Henry; Garcia, Diego Ribeiro; Furlan, Valter; Lopes, Renato Delascio.
Affiliation
  • de Barros E Silva PGM; United Health Group Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Szneider H; Brazilian Clinical Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Garcia DR; United Health Group Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Furlan V; United Health Group Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Lopes RD; United Health Group Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil.
Glob Heart ; 19(1): 65, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39157208
ABSTRACT

Background:

There is limited real-world data of lipid control and healthcare costs among patients with and without Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) in Latin America.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study including patients with LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) assessment from 2015 to 2017 was performed in a health insurance database. Patient characteristics, comorbidities and laboratory data were collected, and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes were used to identify a subcohort of patients with ASCVD (secondary prevention) and assess the proportion of these patients with LDL-C controlled. Lipid control among patients without ASCVD (primary prevention) and healthcare costs in one year in the overall population were also assessed.

Results:

From the 17,434 patients selected, 5,208 (29.8%) had ASCVD. The mean age of these patients in secondary prevention was 68.9 (±12.3) years and 47.8% were male patients. LDL-C < 70 mg/dL was identified in 19.1% of the ASCVD population and only 4.1% had an LDL-C < 50 mg/dL. LDL control was worse in women compared to men (13.1% vs. 25.7%; P < 0.01). The average cost in one year was 3,591 American dollars (USD) per patient in primary prevention compared to 8,210 dollars per year for patients in secondary prevention (P < 0.01). While outpatient costs accounted for 59.8% of the total cost in the primary prevention group, the main cost of the secondary prevention population was related to hospital costs (54.1%).

Conclusion:

Despite the favorable evidence for intensive cholesterol reduction, the evaluation of large real-world database with more than 17,000 individuals showed that the targets of guideline recommendations have not yet been adequately incorporated into clinical practice. Average annual cost per patient in secondary prevention is more than twice compared to primary prevention. Hospital expenses account for most of the cost in the secondary prevention group, while outpatient costs predominate in primary prevention.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Care Costs / Atherosclerosis Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Glob Heart Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brasil

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Care Costs / Atherosclerosis Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Glob Heart Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brasil