Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
One-year outcome of robotical vs. manual percutaneous coronary intervention.
von Zur Mühlen, Constantin; Jeuck, Marvin; Heidt, Timo; Maulhardt, Thomas; Hartikainen, Tau; Supady, Alexander; Hilgendorf, Ingo; Wolf, Dennis; Kaier, Klaus; Westermann, Dirk; Rilinger, Jonathan.
Affiliation
  • von Zur Mühlen C; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Jeuck M; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Heidt T; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Maulhardt T; Max Grundig Klinik, Bühl, Germany.
  • Hartikainen T; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Supady A; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Hilgendorf I; Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Wolf D; Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kaier K; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Westermann D; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Rilinger J; Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Clin Res Cardiol ; 2024 Aug 21.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39167194
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI) is a promising technology for optimizing the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease. For a better understanding of the potential of R-PCI in clinical routine compared to conventional manual PCI (M-PCI) both initial treatment success of the index procedure and long-term outcome have to be analysed.

METHODS:

Prospective evaluation from the FRiK (DRKS00023868) registry of all R-PCI cases with the CorPath GRX Cardiology by Siemens Healthineers and Corindus in the Freiburg University Heart Center between 04/2022 and 03/2023. Index procedure success and safety, radiation dose of patients and personnel, and 1-year outcome will be reported. Findings will be compared to a prospective control group of M-PCI patients treated by the same team of interventionalists during the same observation period.

RESULTS:

Seventy patients received R-PCI and were included in the registry. PCI success rate was 100%, with 19% requiring manual assistance. No complications (MACE-major adverse cardiovascular events) occurred. Compared with 70 matched-pair M-PCI patients, there was a higher median procedural time (103 min vs. 67 min, p < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (18 min vs. 15 min, p = 0.002), and more contrast volume was used (180 ml vs. 160 ml, p = 0.041) in R-PCI vs. M-PCI patients. However, there was no significant difference of the dose-area product (4062 vs. 3242 cGycm2, p = 0.361). One year after the intervention, there was no difference in mortality, rehospitalisation, unscheduled PCI or target vessel failure. Health-related quality of life evaluation 6 and 12 months after the index procedure (NYHA, CCS, SAQ7 and EQ-5D-5L) was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION:

R-PCI is feasible and safe. Compared to M-PCI, index procedure success rate is high, safety profile is favourable, and manual assistance was required in only few cases. At 1-year follow-up results for R-PCI vs. M-PCI considering mortality, rehospitalisation, morbidity and target vessel failure were equal.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Clin Res Cardiol / Clin. res. cardiol / Clinical research in cardiology Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Alemania Country of publication: Alemania

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Clin Res Cardiol / Clin. res. cardiol / Clinical research in cardiology Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Alemania Country of publication: Alemania