Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Camrelizumab, apatinib and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with microwave ablation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Zuo, Meng-Xuan; An, Chao; Cao, Yu-Zhe; Pan, Jia-Yu; Xie, Lu-Ping; Yang, Xin-Jing; Li, Wang; Wu, Pei-Hong.
Affiliation
  • Zuo MX; Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
  • An C; Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese General PLA Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
  • Cao YZ; Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Pan JY; Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Xie LP; Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Yang XJ; Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Li W; Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Wu PH; Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China. wuph@sysucc.org.cn.
World J Gastrointest Oncol ; 16(8): 3481-3495, 2024 Aug 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39171171
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and camrelizumab plus apatinib (TRIPLET protocol) is promising for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Ad-HCC). However, the usefulness of microwave ablation (MWA) after TRIPLET is still controversial.

AIM:

To compare the efficacy and safety of TRIPLET alone (T-A) vs TRIPLET-MWA (T-M) for Ad-HCC.

METHODS:

From January 2018 to March 2022, 217 Ad-HCC patients were retrospectively enrolled. Among them, 122 were included in the T-A group, and 95 were included in the T-M group. A propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance bias. Overall survival (OS) was compared using the Kaplan-Meier curve with the log-rank test. The overall objective response rate (ORR) and major complications were also assessed.

RESULTS:

After PSM, 82 patients were included both the T-A group and the T-M group. The ORR (85.4%) in the T-M group was significantly higher than that (65.9%) in the T-A group (P < 0.001). The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 98.7%, 93.4%, and 82.0% in the T-M group and 85.1%, 63.1%, and 55.0% in the T-A group (hazard ratio = 0.22; 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.49; P < 0.001). The incidence of major complications was 4.9% (6/122) in the T-A group and 5.3% (5/95) in the T-M group, which were not significantly different (P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION:

T-M can provide better survival outcomes and comparable safety for Ad-HCC than T-A.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: World J Gastrointest Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: World J Gastrointest Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: China