Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET Imaging in Differentiating Parkinson's Disease from Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively assess the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET in differentiating Parkinson's Disease (PD) from Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes (APSs). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify studies published from the inception of the databases up to June 2024 that used 18F-FDG PET imaging for the differential diagnosis of PD and APSs. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 or QUADAS-AI tool. Bivariate random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curves (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC). RESULTS: 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 1508 PD patients and 1370 APSs patients. 12 studies relied on visual interpretation by radiologists, of which the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and SROC-AUC for direct visual interpretation in diagnosing PD were 96% (95%CI 91%, 98%), 90% (95%CI 83%, 95%), and 0.98 (95%CI 0.96, 0.99), respectively; the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and SROC-AUC for visual interpretation supported by univariate algorithms in diagnosing PD were 93% (95%CI 90%, 95%), 90% (95%CI 85%, 94%), and 0.96 (95%CI 0.94, 0.97), respectively. 12 studies relied on artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze 18F-FDG PET imaging data. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and SROC-AUC of machine learning (ML) for diagnosing PD were 87% (95%CI 82%, 91%), 91% (95%CI 86%, 94%), and 0.95 (95%CI 0.93, 0.96), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and SROC-AUC of deep learning (DL) for diagnosing PD were 97% (95%CI 95%, 98%), 95% (95%CI 89%, 98%), and 0.98 (95%CI 0.96, 0.99), respectively. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET has a high accuracy in differentiating PD from APS, among which AI-assisted automatic classification performs well, with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of radiologists, and is expected to become an important auxiliary means of clinical diagnosis in the future.