Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of sacral neuromodulation in male patients with overactive bladder, chronic pelvic pain, and fecal incontinence.
Ferreira, Roseanne; Alwashmi, Emad; Otis-Chapados, Samuel; Bhojani, Naeem; Zorn, Kevin C; Chughtai, Bilal; Elterman, Dean S.
Affiliation
  • Ferreira R; Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Alwashmi E; Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Otis-Chapados S; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
  • Bhojani N; Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Zorn KC; Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Chughtai B; BPHCanada Prostate Center, Mont-Royal Surgical Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Elterman DS; Smith Institute of Urology, Plainview Hospital, Northwell Health, Syosset, New York, USA.
Can J Urol ; 31(4): 11943-11949, 2024 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39217518
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Despite the growing body of literature on sacral neuromodulation (SNM) outcomes, research focusing on male patients remains limited and often represented by small cohorts nested within a larger study of mostly women. Herein, we evaluated the outcomes of SNM in a male-only cohort with overactive bladder (OAB), fecal incontinence (FI), chronic bladder pain, and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This retrospective cohort study included 64 male patients who underwent SNM insertion between 2013 and 2021 at a high-volume tertiary center. Indications for SNM therapy included OAB, FI, chronic pelvic pain, and NLUTD. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's and t-test were used in analysis.

RESULTS:

The mean age was 57.7 ± 13.4 years, and the most frequent reason for SNM insertion was idiopathic OAB (72%), FI (16%), pelvic pain (11%), and NLUTD (11%). A majority (84%) of men received treatment prior to SNM insertion. 84% reported satisfaction and 92% symptom improvement within the first year, and these improvements persisted beyond 1 year in 73% of patients. Mean follow up was 52.7 ± 21.0 months. The complication rate was 23%, and the need for adjunct treatments was significantly reduced (73% to 27%, p < 0.001). Treatment outcomes did not differ significantly between various indications for SNM therapy or the presence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

CONCLUSION:

SNM is an effective and safe procedure for male patients with neurogenic and non-neurogenic OAB, pelvic pain, and FI. Over 70% of patients experienced symptomatic improvement and remained satisfied in the mid to long term follow up. BPH does not seem to hinder treatment outcomes.
Subject(s)
Key words
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Electric Stimulation Therapy / Pelvic Pain / Urinary Bladder, Overactive / Fecal Incontinence / Chronic Pain / Lumbosacral Plexus Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Can J Urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá Country of publication: Canadá
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Electric Stimulation Therapy / Pelvic Pain / Urinary Bladder, Overactive / Fecal Incontinence / Chronic Pain / Lumbosacral Plexus Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Can J Urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá Country of publication: Canadá