Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Methane fluxes in tidal marshes of the conterminous United States.
Arias-Ortiz, Ariane; Wolfe, Jaxine; Bridgham, Scott D; Knox, Sara; McNicol, Gavin; Needelman, Brian A; Shahan, Julie; Stuart-Haëntjens, Ellen J; Windham-Myers, Lisamarie; Oikawa, Patty Y; Baldocchi, Dennis D; Caplan, Joshua S; Capooci, Margaret; Czapla, Kenneth M; Derby, R Kyle; Diefenderfer, Heida L; Forbrich, Inke; Groseclose, Gina; Keller, Jason K; Kelley, Cheryl; Keshta, Amr E; Kleiner, Helena S; Krauss, Ken W; Lane, Robert R; Mack, Sarah; Moseman-Valtierra, Serena; Mozdzer, Thomas J; Mueller, Peter; Neubauer, Scott C; Noyce, Genevieve; Schäfer, Karina V R; Sanders-DeMott, Rebecca; Schutte, Charles A; Vargas, Rodrigo; Weston, Nathaniel B; Wilson, Benjamin; Megonigal, J Patrick; Holmquist, James R.
Affiliation
  • Arias-Ortiz A; Physics Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Wolfe J; Ecosystem Science Division, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
  • Bridgham SD; Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, Maryland, USA.
  • Knox S; Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
  • McNicol G; Department of Geography, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Needelman BA; Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Shahan J; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Stuart-Haëntjens EJ; Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
  • Windham-Myers L; Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Oikawa PY; U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Mission Area, Menlo Park, California, USA.
  • Baldocchi DD; U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Mission Area, Menlo Park, California, USA.
  • Caplan JS; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, California, USA.
  • Capooci M; Ecosystem Science Division, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
  • Czapla KM; Department of Architecture & Environmental Design, Temple University, Ambler, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Derby RK; Department of Plant & Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
  • Diefenderfer HL; Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
  • Forbrich I; Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Chesapeake Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, Annapolis, Maryland, USA.
  • Groseclose G; Coastal Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Sequim, Washington, USA.
  • Keller JK; Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Kelley C; Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
  • Keshta AE; Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Kleiner HS; Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, California, USA.
  • Krauss KW; Kravis Department of Integrated Sciences, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, California, USA.
  • Lane RR; Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
  • Mack S; Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
  • Moseman-Valtierra S; Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
  • Mozdzer TJ; Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, Maryland, USA.
  • Mueller P; U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA.
  • Neubauer SC; Comite Resources, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Noyce G; Tierra Resources LLC, Lafitte, Louisiana, USA.
  • Schäfer KVR; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
  • Sanders-DeMott R; Bryn Mawr College, Department of Biology, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Schutte CA; Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Vargas R; Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Weston NB; Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, Maryland, USA.
  • Wilson B; Earth and Environmental Science Dept, Rutgers University Newark, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
  • Megonigal JP; U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Holmquist JR; Department of Environmental Science, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey, USA.
Glob Chang Biol ; 30(9): e17462, 2024 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39234688
ABSTRACT
Methane (CH4) is a potent greenhouse gas (GHG) with atmospheric concentrations that have nearly tripled since pre-industrial times. Wetlands account for a large share of global CH4 emissions, yet the magnitude and factors controlling CH4 fluxes in tidal wetlands remain uncertain. We synthesized CH4 flux data from 100 chamber and 9 eddy covariance (EC) sites across tidal marshes in the conterminous United States to assess controlling factors and improve predictions of CH4 emissions. This effort included creating an open-source database of chamber-based GHG fluxes (https//doi.org/10.25573/serc.14227085). Annual fluxes across chamber and EC sites averaged 26 ± 53 g CH4 m-2 year-1, with a median of 3.9 g CH4 m-2 year-1, and only 25% of sites exceeding 18 g CH4 m-2 year-1. The highest fluxes were observed at fresh-oligohaline sites with daily maximum temperature normals (MATmax) above 25.6°C. These were followed by frequently inundated low and mid-fresh-oligohaline marshes with MATmax ≤25.6°C, and mesohaline sites with MATmax >19°C. Quantile regressions of paired chamber CH4 flux and porewater biogeochemistry revealed that the 90th percentile of fluxes fell below 5 ± 3 nmol m-2 s-1 at sulfate concentrations >4.7 ± 0.6 mM, porewater salinity >21 ± 2 psu, or surface water salinity >15 ± 3 psu. Across sites, salinity was the dominant predictor of annual CH4 fluxes, while within sites, temperature, gross primary productivity (GPP), and tidal height controlled variability at diel and seasonal scales. At the diel scale, GPP preceded temperature in importance for predicting CH4 flux changes, while the opposite was observed at the seasonal scale. Water levels influenced the timing and pathway of diel CH4 fluxes, with pulsed releases of stored CH4 at low to rising tide. This study provides data and methods to improve tidal marsh CH4 emission estimates, support blue carbon assessments, and refine national and global GHG inventories.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Greenhouse Gases / Wetlands / Methane Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Glob Chang Biol / Glob. chang. biol / Global change biology Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: España Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Greenhouse Gases / Wetlands / Methane Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Glob Chang Biol / Glob. chang. biol / Global change biology Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: España Country of publication: Reino Unido