Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antenatal depression and drug use among deaf and hard-of-hearing birthing parents: results from a U.S. National Survey.
Tan, Nasya S; James, Tyler G; McKee, Kimberly S; Moore Simas, Tiffany A; Smith, Lauren D; McKee, Michael M; Mitra, Monika.
Affiliation
  • Tan NS; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • James TG; Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. jamesty@med.umich.edu.
  • McKee KS; Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Moore Simas TA; Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Pediatrics, Psychiatry, and Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
  • Smith LD; Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
  • McKee MM; Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Mitra M; Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39259355
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to investigate antenatal depression and drug use among deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) birthing parents who use American Sign Language (ASL), spoken English, or bilingually both ASL and English.

METHODS:

DHH participants in the United States responded to the Survey on Pregnancy Experiences of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Women. Respondents self-reported their antenatal depression diagnoses and drug use (i.e., pain relievers, cannabis, or illicit drugs) during their last pregnancy. Poisson regression models were used to estimate prevalence ratios, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, and parity.

RESULTS:

The average age of respondents (n = 587) was 35 years. Respondents were predominantly non-Hispanic white (80%), college educated (60%), and married (74%). Relative to DHH English-speakers, DHH ASL-users had lower prevalence of reporting antenatal depression diagnosis (aPR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.72). DHH people who reported antenatal depression diagnosis had higher prevalence of reporting antenatal drug use (PR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.65 to 3.33). There were no significant associations between preferred language and antenatal drug use.

CONCLUSIONS:

DHH ASL-users are less likely to report receiving an antenatal depression diagnosis compared to DHH English-speakers. Given well-documented patient-provider communication barriers among DHH ASL-users, it is unclear if the lower prevalence observed in this study is the result of inadequate or inaccessible screening during pregnancy. Future work should consider universal use of linguistically appropriate screening tools for DHH birthing parents in both clinical and research settings.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Journal subject: PSICOLOGIA / SAUDE DA MULHER Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Austria

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Journal subject: PSICOLOGIA / SAUDE DA MULHER Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Austria