Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Palliative procedures for advanced obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ma, Bingqing; Ren, Tianxing; Cai, Chengjun; Chen, Biao; Zhang, Jinxiang.
Affiliation
  • Ma B; Department of Emergency General Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Ren T; Department of Emergency General Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Cai C; Department of Emergency General Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Chen B; Department of Emergency General Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Zhang J; Department of Emergency General Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. zhangjinxiang@hust.edu.cn.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 148, 2024 Sep 23.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39311995
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Advanced obstructive colorectal cancer (AOCC) presents surgical challenges. Consideration must be given to alleviating symptoms and also quality of life and survival time. This study compared prognostic efficacies of palliative self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) and surgery to provide insights into AOCC treatment.

METHODS:

PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies that met inclusion criteria. Using a meta-analysis approach, postoperative complications, survival rates, and other prognostic indicators were compared between patients treated with SEMSs and those treated surgically. Network meta-analysis was performed to compare prognoses between SEMS, primary tumor resection (PTR), and stoma/bypass (S/B).

RESULTS:

Twenty-one studies were selected (1754 patients). The odds ratio (OR) of SEMS for clinical success compared with surgery was 0.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15, 0.65). The ORs for early and late complications were 0.34 (95% CI 0.19, 0.59) and 2.30 (95% CI 1.22, 4.36), respectively. The ORs for 30-day mortality and stoma formation were 0.65 (95% CI 0.42, 1.01) and 0.11 (95% CI 0.05, 0.22), respectively. Standardized mean difference in hospital stay was - 2.08 (95% CI - 3.56, 0.59). The hazard ratio for overall survival was 1.24 (95% CI 1.08, 1.42). Network meta-analysis revealed that SEMS had the lowest incidence of early complications and rate of stoma formation and the shortest hospital stay. PTR ranked first in clinical success rate and had the lowest late-complication rate. The S/B group exhibited the lowest 30-day mortality rate.

CONCLUSION:

Among palliative treatments for AOCC, SEMSs had lower early complication, stoma formation, and 30-day mortality rates and shorter hospital stays. Surgery had higher clinical success and overall survival rates and lower incidence of late complications. Patient condition/preferences should be considered when selecting AOCC treatment.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palliative Care / Colorectal Neoplasms / Intestinal Obstruction Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: Alemania

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palliative Care / Colorectal Neoplasms / Intestinal Obstruction Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: Alemania