Homologous proteins with different affinities for groEL. The refolding of the aspartate aminotransferase isozymes at varying temperatures.

ABSTRACT

The homologous cytosolic and mitochondrial isozymes of aspartate aminotransferase (c- and mAspAT, respectively) seem to follow very different folding pathways after synthesis in rabbit reticulocyte lysate, suggesting that the nascent proteins interact differently with molecular chaperones (Mattingly, J. R., Jr., Iriarte, A., and Martinez-Carrion, M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26320-26327). In an attempt to discern the structural basis for this phenomenon, we have begun to study the effect of temperature on the refolding of the guanidine hydrochloride-denatured, purified proteins and their interaction with the groEL/groES molecular chaperone system from Escherichia coli. In the absence of chaperones, temperature has a critical effect on the refolding of the two isozymes, with mAspAT being more susceptible than cAspAT to diminishing refolding yields at increasing temperatures. No refolding is observed for mAspAT at physiological temperatures. The molecular chaperones groEL and groES can extend the temperature range over which the AspAT isozymes successfully refold; however, cAspAT can still refold at higher temperatures than mAspAT. In the absence of groES and MgATP, the two isozymes interact differently with groEL, groEL arrests the refolding of mAspAT throughout the temperature range of 0-45 degrees C. Adding only MgATP releases very little mAspAT from groEL; both groES and MgATP are required for significant refolding of mAspAT in the presence of groEL. On the other hand, the extent to which groEL inhibits the refolding of cAspAT depends upon the temperature of the refolding reaction, only slowing the reaction at 0 degrees C but arresting it completely at 30 degrees C. MgATP alone is sufficient to effect the release of cAspAT from groEL at any temperature examined; inclusion of groES along with MgATP has no effect on the refolding yield but does increase the refolding rate at temperatures greater than 15 degrees C. These results demonstrate that groEL can have significantly different affinities for proteins with highly homologous final tertiary and quarternary structures and suggest that dissimilarities in the primary sequence of the protein substrates may control the structure of the folding intermediates captured by groEL and/or the composition of the surfaces through which the folding proteins interact with groEL.