Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Calibration in water versus calibration in air for cobalt-60 gamma rays.
Med Phys ; 4(1): 68-9, 1977.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-840192
ABSTRACT
In the United States it is common practice to calibrate Cobalt-60 teletherapy machines "in air," despite recommendations by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) and other organizations that calibration be accomplished by measurement at 5-cm depth in a water phantom. A comparison has been made between the results of ionization measurements in air at 80.5-cm distance from the source and in water at 80-cm source-skin distance (SSD) for the determination of absorbed dose at three depth (5, 10, and 15 cm) for each of three fields sizes (6 X 6, 10 X 10, and 20 X 20 cm2), for a total of 42 Cobalt-60 machines. The mean of the ratio, absorbed dose from in-water measurements to absorbed dose at the same depth calculated from in-air measurements, ranged frt 5-cm depth for a 20 X 20-cm2 field size. Reasons for the differences are offered, and compliance with ICRU recommendations is suggested.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiation, Ionizing / Radioisotope Teletherapy / Radiotherapy Dosage / Cobalt Radioisotopes / Gamma Rays Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Med Phys Year: 1977 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiation, Ionizing / Radioisotope Teletherapy / Radiotherapy Dosage / Cobalt Radioisotopes / Gamma Rays Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Med Phys Year: 1977 Document type: Article