Macrophage tropism: fact or fiction?

ABSTRACT

Primary HIV-1 isolates can be distinguished by phenotypic qualities such as the ability to productively infect cells of established CD4-positive lines and to induce syncytia in MT-2 cells. Such viral phenotypes have also been reported to confer host cell specificity. It is perceived that primary isolates with the syncytium-inducing phenotype (SI or rapid/high) are T cell tropic and are therefore unable to infect primary cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage. However, we have consistently found that these isolates are as capable of establishing infection in monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) as the monocytotropic, non-syncytium-inducing variants (NSI or slow/low). It is known that differentiation, activation, and proliferation of human monocytes are affected by both isolation methods and culture conditions. Therefore, to test whether our inability to discriminate macrophage tropic HIV-1 isolates could be explained by differences in culturing techniques, we isolated monocytes by elutriation or short-term adherence and allowed the cells to mature and differentiate in either the presence or absence of autologous lymphocytes. After removal of nonadherent cells, MDM were infected with a panel of SI and NSI primary HIV-1 isolates. MDM were susceptible to infection by the SI as well as the NSI isolates, regardless of whether or not the cells were allowed to mature in the presence of autologous lymphocytes. However, MDM matured in the presence of autologous lymphocytes replicated HIV-1 isolates (both NSI and SI) to a higher titre than MDM matured in the absence of lymphocytes. In light of these findings and recently published reports on HIV-1 phenotype and chemokine receptor usage we believe that the term macrophage-tropic strains of HIV-1 is no longer appropriate.