Clinical Outcome of Novel Reconstruction of Double Shouldering Technique after Proximal Gastrectomy
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
; : 191-196, 2020.
Article
in En
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-900320
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Purpose@#Various reconstruction methods have been proposed to reduce reflux after proximal gastrectomy, and we report here a double shouldering technique. The purpose of this study is to compare the novel double shouldering technique with conventional esophagogastrostomy in terms of short term and 3-year clinical outcome. @*Methods@#A retrospective observational case control study was performed on 63 patients for cT1N0 upper third gastric cancer who underwent proximal gastrectomy from January 2012 to November 2016 at the National Cancer Center, Korea. There were 26 patients with conventional esophagogastrostomy, and 37 patients with novel double shouldering technique. The primary outcome was endoscopic reflux esophagitis findings one and three year after surgery according to Los Angeles classification. Secondary outcomes were short term surgical outcome and reflux symptom. @*Results@#There was no significant difference in reflux esophagitis on endoscopic findings at 1 and 3 years after surgery between the two group. The double shouldering (DS) technique group showed significantly better postoperative outcomes with bile reflux at one and three years via endoscopic findings versus conventional esophagogastrostomy (CEG). Operative time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the CEG group than the DS group. There was no significant difference in terms of reflux symptoms and complications. @*Conclusion@#This novel DS technique is a reconstruction method for use after proximal gastrectomy. It did not show a significant clinical benefit. Development of surgical techniques and further study is needed to identify the optimal reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy.
Full text:
1
Database:
WPRIM
Type of study:
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
Language:
En
Journal:
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
Year:
2020
Document type:
Article