Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dolor abdominal: ¿cuándo pensar en apendicitis aguda? Características epidemiológicas y clínicas de niños ingresados en el Hospital Policial (junio 2008 - noviembre 2014) / Abdominal pain: when should we consider acute appendicitis? epidemiological and clinical characteristics of children admitted to the Uruguayan Police Forces hospital between june 2008 and november 2014 / Dor abdominal: quando pensar em apendicite aguda? características epidemiológicas e clínicas de crianças admitidas no hospital policial de Uruguay em junho de 2008 a novembro de 2014
Gómez, Noelia; Pujadas, Mónica; Parodi, Verónica; Kenny, Juan; Iglesias, Daniel; Martínez, Osvaldo.
Affiliation
  • Gómez, Noelia; Hospital Policial. Pediatría.
  • Pujadas, Mónica; UDELAR. Facultad de Medicina. Clínica Pediátrica "A". UY
  • Parodi, Verónica; Hospital Policial. Emergencia Pediatría.
  • Kenny, Juan; UDELAR. Facultad de Medicina. UY
  • Iglesias, Daniel; Hospital Policial. Servicio Pediatría.
  • Martínez, Osvaldo; Hospital Policial. Servicio Pediatría.
Arch. pediatr. Urug ; 91(2): 78-83, 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1114651
Responsible library: UY1.1
RESUMEN
Resumen

Introducción:

el dolor abdominal agudo es un motivo de consulta frecuente en pediatría. Es importante realizar oportunamente el diagnóstico de apendicitis aguda, ya que esto contribuye a disminuir la morbimortalidad.

Objetivo:

analizar las características epidemiológicas, clínicas y evolución de niños ingresados por dolor abdominal. Identificar características clínicas y paraclínicas que orienten al diagnóstico oportuno de apendicitis aguda.

Metodología:

estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo, incluyendo niños menores de 14 años ingresados en sala de Pediatría entre junio de 2008 y noviembre de 2014. Fuente de datos revisión de historias clínicas.

Resultados:

se incluyeron 217 pacientes; 52% fueron niñas (112) y 48% niños (105). El dolor fue en fosa ilíaca derecha 51% (110); 29% (63) en primavera, 24% (52) en verano, 24% (52) en otoño y 23% (50) en invierno. De los niños con apendicitis 61% (54) presentó vómitos, 26% (23) lengua saburral, 40% (39) fiebre, de éstos 53% (19) 38 a 38,9 °C. Se hallaron en 45% (40) cifras mayores a 15.000 leucocitos, 41% (37) menores a 15.000 y en 14% (12) no se realizó hemograma. La proteína C reactiva (PCR) fue menor a 20 mg/L en 32% (28) y mayor en 22% (20). La ecografía abdominal fue normal en 56% (22); 5% (6) presentó complicaciones durante la internación.

Conclusiones:

el diagnóstico más frecuente fue la apendicitis aguda, seguido de dolor abdominal inespecífico. En la mayoría de los casos en los que se planteó el diagnóstico clínico de apendicitis, fue confirmada en intraoperatorio y por análisis anatomopatológico. El dolor como síntoma tuvo mayor rendimiento diagnóstico. Los vómitos y la fiebre se asociaron con mayor probabilidad de apendicitis aguda. El 40% presentó fiebre, la mayoría entre 38 y 38,9 °C. La leucocitosis y la PCR no fueron orientadores para el diagnóstico de apendicitis. La ecografía abdominal tampoco fue concluyente.
ABSTRACT

Summary:

Introduction:

acute abdominal pain is a reason for frequent consultation in Pediatrics. It is important to diagnose acute appendicitis in time, thus reducing morbidity and mortality.

Objective:

to analyze the epidemiological characteristics, statistics and evolution of children admitted for abdominal pain. Identify the clinical and paraclinical characteristics that lead to diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Methodology:

observational, descriptive, retrospective study of children under 14 years of age previously admitted to the Pediatric ward from June 2008 to November 2014. Data source Review of Electronic Medical Records.

Results:

we included 217 patients, 52% girls (112) and 48% boys (105). The pain was in the right iliac fossa 51% (110). 29% (63) of the cases took place in Spring, 24% (52) Summer, 24% (52) Autumn and 23% (50) in Winter. Of the children with appendicitis 61% (54) presented vomiting, 26% (23) saburral tongue, 40% (39) fever, and 53% of them (19) had 38 to 38.9°C temperature. 45% (40) of them showed more than 15,000 leukocytes, 41% (37) less than 15,000 and no blood count was performed on 14% of patients. CRP was lower than 20 mg/L in 32% (28) of patients and higher in 22% (20) of them. Abdominal ultrasound was normal in 56% (22) of patients. 5% (6) of them presented complications during hospitalization.

Conclusions:

the most frequent diagnosis was acute appendicitis, followed by nonspecific abdominal pain. Most appendicitis cases diagnosed were confirmed intraoperatively and through pathological anatomical analysis. Pain as a symptom had a better diagnostic performance. Vomiting and fever are associated with a higher probability of acute appendicitis. 40% of the patients had fever, mainly between 38 and 38.9°C. Leukocytosis and C-reactive protein were leading factors for the diagnosis of appendicitis. Abdominal ultrasound was also inconclusive.
RESUMO
Resumo

Introdução:

a dor abdominal aguda é motivo frequente de consulta pediátrica. É importante fazer um diagnóstico oportuno da apendicite aguda, pois isso contribui para diminuir a sua morbimortalidade.

Objetivo:

analisar características epidemiológicas, clínicas e evolução de crianças internadas por dor abdominal. Identificar as características clínicas e paraclínicas que levam ao diagnóstico oportuno de apendicite aguda.

Metodologia:

estudo observacional, descritivo, retrospectivo, realizado a crianças menores de 14 anos de idade internadas na Enfermaria Pediátrica de junho de 2008 a novembro de 2014. Fonte de dados revisão dos Prontuários Médicos.

Resultados:

foram incluídos 217 pacientes, 52% meninas (112) e 48% meninos (105). A dor localizou-se na fossa ilíaca direita 51% (110). 29% (63) dos casos ocorreram na primavera, 24% (52) no verão, 24% (52) no outono e 23% (50) no inverno. Das crianças com apendicite 61% (54) apresentaram vômitos, 26% (23) língua saburral, 40% (39) febre e 53% delas (19) apresentaram temperatura de 38 a 38,9°C. 45% (40) delas apresentaram mais de 15.000 leucócitos, 41% (37) menos de 15.000 e não realizamos nenhum hemograma em 14% dos pacientes. A PCR foi inferior a 20 mg/L em 32% (28) dos pacientes e superior em 22% (20) deles. A ultrassonografia abdominal foi normal em 56% (22) dos pacientes. 5% (6) deles apresentaram complicações durante a internação.

Conclusões:

o diagnóstico mais frequente foi apendicite aguda, seguida de dor abdominal inespecífica. A maioria dos casos de apendicite diagnosticada foi confirmada no intra-operatório e através da análise anatômica patológica. A dor como sintoma apresentou melhor desempenho diagnóstico. Vômitos e febre estiveram associados a uma maior probabilidade de apendicite aguda. 40% dos pacientes apresentaram febre, principalmente entre 38 e 38,9°C. A Leucocitose e a Proteína C-reativa foram os principais fatores para realizar o diagnóstico de apendicite. O ultrassom abdominal também foi inconclusivo.


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Health context: Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas / SDG3 - Health and Well-Being / SDG3 - Target 3.4 Reduce premature mortality due to noncommunicable diseases / SDG3 - Target 3.2 Reduce avoidable death in newborns and children under 5 Health problem: Goal 6: Information systems for health / Target 3.2: Reduce avoidable death in newborns and children under 5 / Digestive System Diseases / Environmental Health / Neonatal Healthcare Database: LILACS Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors / Systematic review Country/Region as subject: South America / Uruguay Language: Spanish Journal: Arch. pediatr. Urug Journal subject: Pediatrics Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Uruguay Institution/Affiliation country: UDELAR/UY

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Health context: Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas / SDG3 - Health and Well-Being / SDG3 - Target 3.4 Reduce premature mortality due to noncommunicable diseases / SDG3 - Target 3.2 Reduce avoidable death in newborns and children under 5 Health problem: Goal 6: Information systems for health / Target 3.2: Reduce avoidable death in newborns and children under 5 / Digestive System Diseases / Environmental Health / Neonatal Healthcare Database: LILACS Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors / Systematic review Country/Region as subject: South America / Uruguay Language: Spanish Journal: Arch. pediatr. Urug Journal subject: Pediatrics Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Uruguay Institution/Affiliation country: UDELAR/UY
...