Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Should earthquake mitigation measures be voluntary or required?
s.l; s.n; Apr. 1991. 30 p. ilus.
Non-conventional in En | DESASTRES | ID: des-4359
Responsible library: CR3.1
Localization: CR3.1; DES
ABSTRACT
This paper investigates the impact that volunatry or required insurance will have on the incentive to adopt loss mitigation measure. We show that several factors impact on the amount of mitigation that that an individual is likely to employ The amount of insurance coverage. Insurance reduces the difference between incomes in disaster and non-disaster states of the world. Hence, there is less incentive for individuala to adopt loss reduction measures if they are required to purchase insurance. The estimate of the risk. If individuals underestimate the probability of an earthquake they will very likely underinvest in mitigation. The relationship between premiums and investment in loss mitigation. Insurance may encourage mitigation by conveying information through premium reductions for investment in loss reduction (AU)
Subject(s)
Full text: 1 Collection: 05-specialized Database: DESASTRES Main subject: Damage Assessment / 34661 / Earthquakes / Insurance Language: En Year: 1991 Document type: Non-conventional
Full text: 1 Collection: 05-specialized Database: DESASTRES Main subject: Damage Assessment / 34661 / Earthquakes / Insurance Language: En Year: 1991 Document type: Non-conventional