Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Concomitant boost radiation and concurrent cisplatin for advanced head and neck carcinomas. Preliminary results of a phase II, single-institutional trial
Domínguez Domínguez, Miguel Angel; Manterola Burgaleta, Ana; Vera García, Ruth; Echeverría Zabalza, Maria Eugenia; Oria Mundin, Eugenio; Martínez López, Enrique; Romero Rojano, Pilar; Villafranca Iturre, Elena; Arias de la Vega, Fernando.
Affiliation
  • Domínguez Domínguez, Miguel Angel; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Manterola Burgaleta, Ana; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Vera García, Ruth; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Echeverría Zabalza, Maria Eugenia; Hospital Virgen del Camino. Pamplona. Spain
  • Oria Mundin, Eugenio; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Martínez López, Enrique; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Romero Rojano, Pilar; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Villafranca Iturre, Elena; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Arias de la Vega, Fernando; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 7(2): 60-65, mar. 2005. tab, graf
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-038825
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: ES1.1 - BNCS
RESUMEN
No disponible
ABSTRACT
Introduction. This study aims to asses the effectiveness and toxicity of boost radiotherapy concomitant and concurrent cisplatin for patients with locallyadvanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC). Material and methods. There were 30 patients included in a prospective, phase II single-institution trial and of whom, 29 were at AJCC stage IV and 1 at stage III. Treatment consisted of radiotherapyacceleration fractionation with concomitant boost, 72 Gy, and 2 cycles of concomitant cisplatin (20 mg/m2/day continuous infusion; days 1-5 and 29-33). Amifostine, (i.v. 200 mg/m2) was administered to 26 prior to the first fraction of radiotherapy. Endpoints of the study were quality-of-life (QL), overall survival, and local control of disease. Results. Complete response (CR) was achievedin 23 patients (77%), 2 patients had partial response (PR) (7%), 4 had no response (13%), and 1 was not evaluated for response. The 2-year overall survival and loco-regional control were 60% and 56%, respectively. Main toxicity was grade 3 or 4 mucositis in 93% of the patients. QL scores (questionnaire QLQC30; version 3.0) and the HN cancer module QLQ-HN35) showed a worsening in areas related to thetreatment e.g. dry mouth, problems stretching the mouth, and sticky saliva. Conclusions. this combination modality is active, but toxic, in the treatment for LAHNC. Concomitant boost radiotherapy is probably, not the best radiotherapy schema for combining with chemotherapy in LAHNC
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Cisplatin / Head and Neck Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Observational_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Year: 2005 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Cisplatin / Head and Neck Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Observational_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Year: 2005 Document type: Article