Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of a computerized provider order entry and a clinical decision support system to improve cefazolin use in surgical prophylaxis: a cost saving analysis
Okumura, Lucas Miyake; Veroneze, Izelandia; Burgardt, Celia Ines; Fragoso, Marta Francisca de Fátima.
Affiliation
  • Okumura, Lucas Miyake; Porto Alegre Clinical Hospital. Clinical Pharmacy Division. Porto Alegre. Brazil
  • Veroneze, Izelandia; Clinical Hospital. Infection Control Service. Paraná. Brazil
  • Burgardt, Celia Ines; Clinical Hospital. Infection Control Service. Paraná. Brazil
  • Fragoso, Marta Francisca de Fátima; Clinical Hospital. Infection Control Service. Paraná. Brazil
Pharm. pract. (Granada, Internet) ; 14(3): 0-0, jul.-sept. 2016. graf
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-156622
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
ABSTRACT
Background: Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) and Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) help practitioners to choose evidence-based decisions, regarding patients’ needs. Despite its use in developed countries, in Brazil, the impact of a CPOE/CDSS to improve cefazolin use in surgical prophylaxis was not assessed yet. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the impact of a CDSS to improve the use of prophylactic cefazolin and to assess the cost savings associated to inappropriate prescribing. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that compared two different scenarios: one prior CPOE/CDSS versus after software implementation. We conducted twelve years of data analysis (3 years prior and 9 years after CDSS implementation), where main outcomes from this study included: cefazolin Defined Daily Doses/100 bed-days (DDD), crude costs and product of costs-DDD (cost-DDD/100 bed-days). We applied a Spearman rho non-parametric test to assess the reduction of cefazolin consumption through the years. Results: In twelve years, 84,383 vials of cefazolin were dispensed and represented 38.89 DDD/100 bed-days or USD 44,722.99. Surgical wards were the largest drug prescribers and comprised >95% of our studied sample. While in 2002, there were 6.31 DDD/100 bed-days, 9 years later there was a reduction to 2.15 (p<0.05). In a scenario without CDSS, the hospital would have consumed 75.72 DDD/100 bed-days, which is equivalent to USD 116 998.07. It is estimated that CDSS provided USD 50,433.39 of cost savings. Conclusion: The implementation of a CPOE/CDSS helped to improve prophylactic cefazolin use by reducing its consumption and estimated direct costs (AU)
RESUMEN
No disponible
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Decision Making, Computer-Assisted / Decision Support Systems, Management / Information Systems / Cefazolin / Antibiotic Prophylaxis / Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis / Anti-Bacterial Agents Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Pharm. pract. (Granada, Internet) Year: 2016 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Decision Making, Computer-Assisted / Decision Support Systems, Management / Information Systems / Cefazolin / Antibiotic Prophylaxis / Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis / Anti-Bacterial Agents Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Pharm. pract. (Granada, Internet) Year: 2016 Document type: Article