Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment strategy optimization for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation: a Delphi consensus
Isla, D; Castro, J. de; García-Campelo, R; Majem, M; Vicente, D; Juan-Vidal, O.
Affiliation
  • Isla, D; IIS Aragón. University Hospital Lozano Blesa. Medical Oncology Department. Zaragoza. Spain
  • Castro, J. de; University Hospital La Paz-IDIPAZ. Medical Oncology Department. Madrid. Spain
  • García-Campelo, R; University Hospital A Coruña. Medical Oncology Unit. A Coruña. Spain
  • Majem, M; Hospital Santa Creu I Sant Pau. Medical Oncology Unit. Barcelona. Spain
  • Vicente, D; University Hospital Virgen Macarena. Medical Oncology Unit. Sevilla. Spain
  • Juan-Vidal, O; Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe. Department of Medical Oncology. Thoracic Oncology Unit. Valencia. Spain
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; Clin. transl. oncol. (Print);23(7): 1304-1313, jul. 2021. tab
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-221970
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: ES15.1 - BNCS
ABSTRACT
Aim To stablish a consensus on the treatment strategy for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) in Spain. Methods After a systematic literature review, the scientific committee developed 33 statements in 4 fields: molecular diagnosis (10 items); histologic profile and patient clinical characteristics (7 items); first-line (1L) treatment in EGFRm aNSCLC (8 items); and subsequent-line treatment (8 items). A panel of 31 experts completed 2 Delphi online questionnaires rating their degree of agreement/disagreement for each statement through a 1–9 range scale (1–3 = disagree, 7–9 = agree). Consensus was reached if 2/3 of the participants are in the median range. Results In the first Delphi round consensus was achieved for 24/33 of the statements. One of the assertions was deleted, proceeding to a second round with the eight remaining questions with no consensus or in the range of indeterminacy. Determination of the EGFR status from tissue and analysis of the different biomarkers are two important variables that influenced treatment decision in patients with aNSCLC. 1L treatment should be the best therapeutic option, independently of the subsequent lines of treatment. For patients with the most common activating mutations osimertinib was considered the most efficient and safe 1L option. In case of disease progression, a new biopsy was needed. Conclusions A consensus document is proposed to optimize the treatment strategy for untreated patients with a NSCLC with EGFR sensitizing mutations (AU)
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Lung Neoplasms Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Lung Neoplasms Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Year: 2021 Document type: Article