Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Análisis comparativo de dos protocolos de misoprostol en abortos de segundo trimestre de la gestación / Comparative analysis of two misoprostol protocols in second-trimester pregnancy termination
Martí Malgosa, Laia; Cochs Cosme, Belén; Costa Pueyo, Jordi; Medina Argemí, Sandra; Rodríguez Vicente, Àgueda; Canet Estévez, Yolanda.
Affiliation
  • Martí Malgosa, Laia; Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell. Barcelona. España
  • Cochs Cosme, Belén; Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell. Barcelona. España
  • Costa Pueyo, Jordi; Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell. Barcelona. España
  • Medina Argemí, Sandra; Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell. Barcelona. España
  • Rodríguez Vicente, Àgueda; Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell. Barcelona. España
  • Canet Estévez, Yolanda; Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell. Barcelona. España
Prog. obstet. ginecol. (Ed. impr.) ; 54(6): 300-305, jun. 2011.
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-88920
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
RESUMEN
Objetivo. Comparar el tiempo medio de expulsión de dos protocolos de misoprostol vaginal en abortos de segundo trimestre. Material y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo de 281 casos entre enero de 2000 y diciembre de 2005 (protocolo A: 800mg/24h) y junio de 2007 y diciembre de 2008 (protocolo B: 400mg/4h). Se recogió como variable principal el tiempo de expulsión. Resultados. El tiempo medio de expulsión fue similar para los dos protocolos (19,7h para el A y 17,7h para el B). Tampoco encontramos diferencias significativas en cuanto a las tasas de expulsión a las 12, 24 y 48h. El efecto adverso observado con mayor frecuencia fue la fiebre, siendo más frecuente en el protocolo B. No hubo efectos adversos mayores como rotura uterina o hemorragia severa. Conclusiones. No existen diferencias significativas entre los dos protocolos en cuánto a tiempo medio de expulsión fetal, aunque sí mayor porcentaje de fiebre en el protocolo B (AU)
ABSTRACT
Objective. To compare the mean induction-expulsion times in two regimens of vaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination. Material and methods. We performed a retrospective study of 281 pregnancies between January 2000 and December 2005 (regimen A: 800mg /24h) and between June 2007 and December 2008 (regimen B: 400mg /4h). Induction-expulsion time was taken as the main outcome. Results. The mean expulsion time was similar in both regimens (19.7h for A and 17.7h for B). No significant differences were found in the expulsion rate at 12, 24 and 48h. The most commonly observed adverse effect was fever, which was more frequent in regimen B. No major adverse effects such as uterine rupture or severe hemorrhage were observed. Conclusions. No significant differences were found between regimens A and B in the mean fetal expulsion time, although fever was more common in regimen B (AU)
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Pregnancy Trimester, Second / Mifepristone / Clinical Protocols / 28640 / Misoprostol / Abortion, Threatened / Fever Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: Es Journal: Prog. obstet. ginecol. (Ed. impr.) Year: 2011 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Pregnancy Trimester, Second / Mifepristone / Clinical Protocols / 28640 / Misoprostol / Abortion, Threatened / Fever Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: Es Journal: Prog. obstet. ginecol. (Ed. impr.) Year: 2011 Document type: Article