Long-term follow-up of stent implantation versus stent-like angioplasty in unstable angina.

ABSTRACT

Stent-like plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA, < or = 30% residual diameter stenosis) in patients with stable angina resulted in a clinical and angiographic long-term outcome equivalent to stenting. In unstable angina POBA showed lower acute and long-term efficacy than in the stable setting. Data comparing stent-like POBA and coronary stenting in unstable angina are lacking in the literature. The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to compare the long-term effectiveness of stent-like POBA and coronary stenting in unstable angina. From January 1996 to December 1996 we retrospectively examined 187 consecutive patients with unstable angina who underwent coronary angioplasty on a native vessel 135 had coronary stenting in addition to POBA and 50 achieved a stent-like result with POBA. Two patients, with major contraindication to coronary stenting, who did not reach a stent-like angiographic result, were also treated with only POBA but were excluded from the study. Stent implantation indications were elective (54 stents, 30%), suboptimal angiographic result (104 stents, 58%), and bail-out situation (21 stents, 12%). Stent implantation showed high angiographic (98.5%) and clinical (95.5%) success. Stent thrombosis occurred only in 2 patients (1.5%). At quantitative coronary angiography the stent group showed a higher post-procedure minimal lumen diameter (2.74 +/- 1.25 vs 2.27 +/- 0.58 mm, p = 0.025), acute gain (1.95 +/- 1.28 vs 1.43 +/- 0.57 mm, p = 0.007) and lower residual stenosis diameter (13.89 +/- 7.43 vs 20.4 +/- 7.28%, p = 0.001) than the stent-like POBA group. At 1-year follow-up the stent group showed a higher event-free survival rate (77.9 vs 64.6%, p = 0.009) mainly due to lower recurrence of angina and repetition of percutaneous procedures. Stent-like POBA procedure and baseline lesion length > or = 10 mm proved to be the only independent predictors of long-term ischemic event occurrence. In conclusion, in unstable angina, stent implantation appears more effective than stent-like POBA to avoid long-term ischemic complications.