Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phase III trial comparing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to leridistim in the prevention of neutropenic complications in breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide: results of the BCIRG 004 trial.
Nabholtz, Jean-Marc; Cantin, Jacques; Chang, Jose; Guevin, Raymond; Patel, Ravi; Tkaczuk, Katherine; Vodvarka, Pavel; Lindsay, Mary-Ann; Reese, David; Riva, Alessandro; Mackey, John.
Affiliation
  • Nabholtz JM; Cancer Therapy Development Program and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-Los Angeles, Peter Ueberroth Building 3360B, 10945 LeConte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7077, USA. jean-marc.nabholtz@bcirg.com
Clin Breast Cancer ; 3(4): 268-75, 2002 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12425755
ABSTRACT
This randomized, double-blind, phase III trial compared granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) and leridistim (formerly myelopoietin), a chimeric dual agonist that binds both G-CSF and interleukin-3 receptors, for the prevention of neutropenic complications in patients with breast cancer receiving TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy. Patients with metastatic (44%) or localized breast cancer (56%) were randomized to G-CSF 5 microg/kg subcutaneously (s.c.) daily (n = 135), leridistim 5 microg/kg s.c. daily (n = 139), or leridistim 10 microg/kg s.c. every other day alternating with placebo (n = 139). Following administration of TAC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) on day 1, patients received growth factor beginning on day 2 until the postnadir absolute neutrophil count exceeded 1500 cells/ microL. Chemotherapy cycles were repeated every 21 days. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 7% in the G-CSF arm, 19% in the daily leridistim arm (P = 0.003 for comparison with G-CSF) and 22% in the alternate-day leridistim arm (P < 0.001 for comparison with G-CSF). There was no significant difference between treatment arms in the cumulative percentage of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia at some point during therapy (85%-88%). However, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 53% of cycles in the G-CSF cohort, 61% of cycles in the daily leridistim group (P = 0.063 for comparison with G-CSF), and 63% of cycles in the alternate-day leridistim group (P = 0.015 for comparison with G-CSF). We conclude that G-CSF is superior to leridistim in the prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients with advanced breast cancer receiving TAC chemotherapy. The up-front prophylactic use of G-CSF is a reasonable supportive therapy for patients treated with docetaxel/anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / Interleukin-3 / Paclitaxel / Taxoids / Neutropenia Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2002 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / Interleukin-3 / Paclitaxel / Taxoids / Neutropenia Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2002 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States