[More care for a limited budget; a case for a better use of the efficiency criteria]. / Meer zorg bij beperkt budget; een pleidooi voor een betere inzet van het doelmatigheidscriterium.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd
; 146(47): 2254-8, 2002 Nov 23.
Article
in Nl
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-12481524
A systematic consideration of the cost-effectiveness in decisions concerning the financing and implementation of healthcare technologies would contribute to the efficiency of the Dutch healthcare system. This consideration applies to the initial decision to finance a project, the periodic testing of this on the basis of practice data and the policy to promote a cost-effective approach in daily practice (via practice guidelines). Bearing in mind that the government has decided to allocate few additional resources to healthcare, it should undertake measures to ensure the systematic use of such information in these steps. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom can serve as an example, where broadly supported guidelines are drawn up with systematic attention for the cost-effectiveness and the implications for healthcare. Within this context the question arises as to whether a Dutch variant of NICE is needed.
Search on Google
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Technology Assessment, Biomedical
/
Biomedical Technology
/
National Health Programs
Type of study:
Guideline
/
Health_economic_evaluation
/
Health_technology_assessment
/
Prognostic_studies
Aspects:
Implementation_research
Limits:
Humans
Country/Region as subject:
Europa
Language:
Nl
Journal:
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd
Year:
2002
Document type:
Article
Country of publication:
Netherlands