Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing the long-term cost-effectiveness of repaglinide plus metformin versus nateglinide plus metformin in type 2 diabetes patients with inadequate glycaemic control: an application of the CORE Diabetes Model in type 2 diabetes.
Palmer, Andrew J; Roze, Stéphane; Lammert, Morten; Valentine, William J; Minshall, Michael E; Nicklasson, Lars; Gall, Mari-Anne; Spinas, Giatgen A.
Affiliation
  • Palmer AJ; CORE--Center for Outcomes Research, Binningen/Basel, Switzerland. ap@thecenter.ch
Curr Med Res Opin ; 20 Suppl 1: S41-51, 2004 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15324515
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

As an example application of the CORE Diabetes Model in type 2 diabetes, we simulated the cost-effectiveness of repaglinide/metformin combination therapy versus nateglinide/metformin for treatment of individuals with type 2 diabetes with an inadequate response to sulphonylurea, metformin, or fixed dose glyburide/metformin.

METHODS:

The CORE Diabetes Model was used to simulate long-term outcomes for a cohort of individuals with type 2 diabetes treated with either repaglinide/metformin or nateglinide/metformin. HbA1c changes for each regimen were taken from a comparative study. At the end of the study, changes in HbA1c from baseline were -1.28% points and -0.67% points for repaglinide/metformin and nateglinide/metformin, respectively. Median final doses were 5.0 mg/day for repaglinide, 360 mg/day for nateglinide and 2000 mg/day metformin in each treatment arm. Costs were calculated as the annual costs for drugs plus costs of complications (US Medicare perspective) over a 30-year period. Life expectancy (LE) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) were calculated. Outcomes and costs were discounted at 3% annually.

RESULTS:

With repaglinide/metformin, improved glycaemic control led to projected decreases in complication rates, improvement of LE and QALE by 0.15 and 0.14 years respectively, and total cost savings of 3,662 dollars/person over the 30-year period. Repaglinide/metformin had a 96% probability that the incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year gained would be 20,000 dollars or less, and a 66% probability that repaglinide/metformin would be cost-saving compared to nateglinide/metformin. Sensitivity analyses supported the validity and reliability of the results.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the health economic context, repaglinide/metformin combination was dominant to nateglinide/metformin. The CORE Diabetes Model is a tool to help third-party reimbursement payers identify treatments for type 2 diabetes that are good value for money.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Phenylalanine / Piperidines / Computer Simulation / Carbamates / Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Models, Econometric / Health Care Costs / Decision Support Systems, Clinical / Cyclohexanes / Diabetes Complications Type of study: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Year: 2004 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Phenylalanine / Piperidines / Computer Simulation / Carbamates / Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Models, Econometric / Health Care Costs / Decision Support Systems, Clinical / Cyclohexanes / Diabetes Complications Type of study: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Year: 2004 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland