Comparison of differing C-reactive protein assay methods and their impact on cardiovascular risk assessment.

Clarke, Jessica L; Anderson, Jeffrey L; Carlquist, John F; Roberts, Richard F; Horne, Benjamin D; Bair, Tami L; Kolek, Matthew J; Mower, Chrissa P; Crane, Ashle M; Roberts, William L; Muhlestein, Joseph B

Clarke, Jessica L; Anderson, Jeffrey L; Carlquist, John F; Roberts, Richard F; Horne, Benjamin D; Bair, Tami L; Kolek, Matthew J; Mower, Chrissa P; Crane, Ashle M; Roberts, William L; Muhlestein, Joseph B.

Affiliation

Clarke JL; Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah 84143, USA.

Am J Cardiol ; 95(1): 155-8, 2005 Jan 01.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15619419

Subject(s)

C-Reactive Protein/analysis; Coronary Artery Disease/blood; Blood Chemical Analysis/methods; Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction/blood; Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Assessment; Sensitivity and Specificity

Search on Google

Add to My VHL

XML

PubMed Links

Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronary Artery Disease / C-Reactive Protein Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Cardiol Year: 2005 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Search on Google

Add to My VHL

XML

PubMed Links