Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Failure of a patient-centered intervention to substantially increase the identification and referral for-treatment of ambulatory emergency department patients with occult psychiatric conditions: a randomized trial [ISRCTN61514736].
Schriger, David L; Gibbons, Patrick S; Nezami, Wais A; Langone, Carol A.
Affiliation
  • Schriger DL; University of California, Los Angeles Emergency Medicine Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. schriger@ucla.edu.
BMC Emerg Med ; 5(1): 2, 2005 May 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15882462
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We previously demonstrated that a computerized psychiatric screening interview (the PRIME-MD) can be used in the Emergency Department (ED) waiting room to identify patients with mental illness. In that trial, however, informing the ED physician of the PRIME-MD results did not increase the frequency of psychiatric diagnosis, consultation or referral. We conducted this study to determine whether telling the patient and physician the PRIME-MD result would result in the majority of PRIME-MD-diagnosed patients being directed toward treatment for their mental illness.

METHODS:

In this single-site RCT, consenting patients with non-specific somatic chief complaints (e.g., fatigue, back pain, etc.) completed the computerized PRIME-MD in the waiting room and were randomly assigned to one of three groups patient and physician told PRIME-MD results, patient told PRIME-MD results, and neither told PRIME-MD results.The main outcome measure was the percentage of patients with a PRIME-MD diagnosis who received a psychiatric consultation or referral from the ED.

RESULTS:

183 (5% of all ED patients) were approached. 123 eligible patients consented to participate, completed the PRIME-MD and were randomized. 95 patients had outcomes recorded. 51 (54%) had a PRIME-MD diagnosis and 8 (16%) of them were given a psychiatric consultation or referral in the ED. While the frequency of consultation or referral increased as the intervention's intensity increased (tell neither = 11% (1/9), tell patient 15% (3/20), tell patient and physician 18% (4/22)), no group came close to the 50% threshold we sought. For this reason, we stopped the trial after an interim analysis.

CONCLUSION:

Patients willingly completed the PRIME-MD and 54% had a PRIME-MD diagnosis. Unfortunately, at our institution, informing the patient (and physician) of the PRIME-MD results infrequently led to the patient being directed toward care for their psychiatric condition.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Language: En Journal: BMC Emerg Med Journal subject: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Year: 2005 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Language: En Journal: BMC Emerg Med Journal subject: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Year: 2005 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States