Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler for maintenance and relief in mild-to-moderate asthma: a randomized, double-blind trial.
Rabe, Klaus F; Pizzichini, Emilio; Ställberg, Björn; Romero, Santiago; Balanzat, Ana M; Atienza, Tito; Lier, Per Arve; Jorup, Carin.
Affiliation
  • Rabe KF; University of Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: K.F.Rabe@lumc.nl.
  • Pizzichini E; University Hospital of Florianópolis, Florianópolis, Brazil.
  • Ställberg B; Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Romero S; Hospital General de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
  • Balanzat AM; Hospital de Clinicas "Jose de San Martin", Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Atienza T; Mary Mediatrix Medical Center, Lipa City, Philippines.
  • Lier PA; Humana Medical Centre, Sandvika, Norway.
  • Jorup C; AstraZeneca R&D, Lund, Sweden.
Chest ; 129(2): 246-256, 2006 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16478838
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVE:

To compare a novel asthma management strategy--budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler for both maintenance therapy and symptom relief--with a higher dose of budesonide plus as-needed terbutaline.

METHODS:

This was a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma (n = 697; mean age, 38 years [range, 11 to 79 years]; mean baseline FEV1, 75% of predicted; mean inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] dosage, 348 microg/d). Following a 2-week run-in period, all patients received two blinded, dry powder inhalers, one containing maintenance medication and one containing medication to be used as needed for the relief of symptoms. Patients were randomized to receive either budesonide/formoterol (80 microg/4.5 microg, two inhalations qd) for maintenance plus additional inhalations as needed for symptom relief, or budesonide (160 microg, two inhalations qd) for maintenance medication plus terbutaline (0.4 mg) as needed. The primary efficacy variable was morning peak expiratory flow (PEF).

RESULTS:

Patients receiving budesonide/formoterol showed greater improvements in morning PEF than patients receiving budesonide (increases of 34.5 L/min vs 9.5 L/min, respectively; p < 0.001). The risk of having a severe exacerbation (hospitalization/emergency department [ED] treatment, oral steroids for asthma, or a > or = 30% decrease from baseline in morning PEF on 2 consecutive days) was 54% lower with budesonide/formoterol vs budesonide (p = 0.0011). Budesonide/formoterol patients experienced 90% fewer hospitalizations/ED treatments due to asthma than budesonide patients (1 vs 10, respectively; p = 0.026). The increased efficacy with budesonide/formoterol was achieved with less ICS than was used in the budesonide group (mean dose, 240 microg/d vs 320 microg/d, respectively) and with 77% fewer oral steroid treatment days vs budesonide (114 days vs 498 days, respectively). Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS:

Budesonide/formoterol for both maintenance and relief improves asthma control with a lower steroid load compared with a higher dose of budesonide plus terbutaline.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Asthma / Bronchodilator Agents / Budesonide / Ethanolamines Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Chest Year: 2006 Document type: Article Publication country: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Asthma / Bronchodilator Agents / Budesonide / Ethanolamines Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Chest Year: 2006 Document type: Article Publication country: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA