Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Spontaneous activity responses to exercise in males and females.
McLaughlin, R; Malkova, D; Nimmo, M A.
Affiliation
  • McLaughlin R; Department of Applied Physiology, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 60(9): 1055-61, 2006 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16493451
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study examines the impact of a short-term exercise programme, prescribed on the basis of current exercise recommendations, on energy balance in males and females to assess whether this type of exercise induces compensatory changes in spontaneous activity energy expenditure (SAEE) and energy intake (EI).

DESIGN:

Individuals were monitored for 16 days, 8 days of habitual physical activity (C) and 8 days when exercise was imposed (E). Total energy expenditure (TEE) was calculated from individual relationships of VO2 and VCO2 to heart rate (HR) records of HR and physical activity obtained during waking hours of the C and E periods and basal metabolic rate (BMR) measurements (Deltatrac System, Datex Instrumentation). Changes in nude body mass (BM) were estimated by using a digital scale (Sartorius AG, Gottigen, Germany).

SETTING:

Laboratory and free-living.

SUBJECTS:

Eight lean females (body fat 17.5+/-4.5%) and eight males of similar percentage body fat participated in this study. All subjects were Caucasian and aged between 20 and 25 years. INTERVENTION During the E period, a supervised exercise session was conducted every second day, each consisting of a total net energy expenditure of 2092 kJ+BMR at 90% lactate threshold.

RESULTS:

During the E period, TEE was higher than C in males and females (exercise 95.2+/-13.9, 78.3+/-15.9 MJ; control 82.4+/-10.4, 68.8+/-16.7 MJ, respectively; P<0.00; P=0.02). SAEE, calculated as TEE minus the energy expended during exercise, was not significantly different between C (males 82.4+/-4.8 MJ; females 68.8+/-7.6 MJ) and E (males 86.8+/-6.3 MJ; females 70.0+/-7.2 MJ) periods in either gender. Males showed no change in BM over the C (pre-intervention 83.4+/-7.2 kg; post-intervention 83.1+/-6.8 kg) or E (pre-intervention 83.4+/-6.8 kg; post-intervention 83.4+/-6.8 kg) periods. Females' BM over the C period did not alter (pre-intervention 63.3+/-2.8 kg; post-intervention 63.7+/-3.1 kg); however, there was a significant decrease (P<0.00) in BM over the E period (pre-intervention 63.0+/-2.7 kg; post-intervention 62.4+/-2.7 kg).

CONCLUSION:

The exercise programme was achieved in males and females without any impact on SAEE. Therefore, differences between genders in relation to BM reduction can be explained by differences in the EI response to exercise.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Energy Intake / Exercise / Weight Loss / Adipose Tissue / Energy Metabolism Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Journal subject: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Year: 2006 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Energy Intake / Exercise / Weight Loss / Adipose Tissue / Energy Metabolism Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Journal subject: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Year: 2006 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom