Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and bilateral anterior-column fixation with two Brantigan I/F cages per level: clinical outcomes during a minimum 2-year follow-up period.
Taneichi, Hiroshi; Suda, Kota; Kajino, Tomomichi; Matsumura, Akira; Moridaira, Hiroshi; Kaneda, Kiyoshi.
Affiliation
  • Taneichi H; Center for Spinal Disorder and Injury, Bibai Rosai Hospital, Japan. tane@bibaih.rofuku.go.jp
J Neurosurg Spine ; 4(3): 198-205, 2006 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16572618
OBJECT: There are no published reports of unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in which two Brantigan I/F cages were placed per level through a single portal to achieve bilateral anterior-column support. The authors describe such a surgical technique and evaluate the clinical outcomes of this procedure. METHODS: Data obtained in 86 (93.5%) of the first 92 consecutive patients who underwent the procedure were retrospectively reviewed; the minimum follow-up duration was 2 years. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system. Disc height, disc angle, cage positioning in the axial plane, and fusion status were radiographically evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 33.8 months. The mean improvement in the JOA score was 77.2%. Fusion was successful in 93% of the cases. According to the Farfan method, the mean anterior and posterior disc heights increased from 20.2 and 16.9% preoperatively to 35.9 and 22.7% at follow up, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean disc angle increased from 4.8degrees preoperatively to 7.5degrees at last follow-up examination (p < 0.01). Two cages were correctly placed to achieve bilateral anterior-column support in greater than 85% of the cases. The following complications occurred: hardware migration in two patients and deep infection cured by intravenous antibiotic therapy in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral TLIF involving the placement of two Brantigan cages per level led to good clinical results. Two Brantigan cages were adequately placed via a single portal, and reliable bilateral anterior-column support was achieved. Although the less invasive unilateral approach was used, the outcomes were as good as those in many reported series of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in which the Brantigan cages were placed via the bilateral approach.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fusion / Surgical Wound Infection / Prosthesis Implantation / Intervertebral Disc Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Journal subject: NEUROCIRURGIA Year: 2006 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japan Country of publication: United States
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fusion / Surgical Wound Infection / Prosthesis Implantation / Intervertebral Disc Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Journal subject: NEUROCIRURGIA Year: 2006 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japan Country of publication: United States