Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Venae Sectio vs. modified Seldinger Technique for totally implantable access ports; Portas-trial [ISRCTN:52368201].
Knebel, P; Fröhlich, B; Knaebel, H-P; Kienle, P; Luntz, S; Buchler, M W; Seiler, C M.
Affiliation
  • Knebel P; Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. phillip.knebel@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Trials ; 7: 20, 2006 Jun 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16762049
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The insertion of a Totally Implantable Access Port (TIAP) is a routinely employed technique in patients who need a safe and permanent venous access. The number of TIAP implantations is increasing constantly mainly due to advanced treatment options for malignant diseases. Therefore it is important to identify the implantation technique which has the optimal benefit/risk ratio for the patient. STUDY

DESIGN:

A single-centre, randomized, controlled superiority trial to compare two different TIAP implantation techniques. SAMPLE SIZE 160 patients will be included and randomized intra-operatively. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Age equal or older than 18 years, patients scheduled for primary elective implantation of a TIAP in local anaesthesia and a signed informed consent. Primary endpoint Primary success rate of the randomized technique. INTERVENTION Venae Sectio in combination with the Seldinger Technique (guide wire and a peel away sheath) will be used to place a TIAP. Reference treatment Conventional Venae Sectio will be used with a direct insertion of the TIAP without guide wire or peel away sheath. Duration of study Approximately 20 months. ORGANISATION/RESPONSIBILITY The trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol and in accordance with the moral, ethical, and scientific principles governing clinical research as set out in the Declaration of Helsinki (1989) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The trial will also be carried out in keeping with local and regulatory requirements. The Klinisches Studienzentrum Chirurgie (KSC)--Centre of Clinical Trials in Surgery at the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg is responsible for planning and conduction of the trial. Documentation of patient's data will be accomplished via electronical Case Report Files (eCRF) with MACRO-Software by the KSC. Randomization, data management, monitoring and biometry are provided by the independent Koordinierungszentrum für Klinische Studien (KKS)--Coordination Centre for Clinical Trails at the University of Heidelberg.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Ethics Language: En Journal: Trials Journal subject: MEDICINA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2006 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Ethics Language: En Journal: Trials Journal subject: MEDICINA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2006 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany