Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Sensitivity to change of questionnaires measuring subjective health--results of a prospective comparative study]. / Anderungssensitivität von Fragebogen zur Erfassung der subjektiven Gesundheit--Ergebnisse einer prospektiven vergleichenden Studie.
Igl, W; Zwingmann, C; Faller, H.
Affiliation
  • Igl W; Institut für Psychotherapie und Medizinische Psychologie der Universität Würzburg, Arbeitsbereich Rehabilitationswissenschaften. wilmar.igl@mail.uni-wuerzburg.de
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 45(4): 232-42, 2006 Aug.
Article in De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16874580
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Questionnaires measuring patients' subjective health or health-related quality of life are indispensable tools for the evaluation of effects revealed by intervention studies in the field of medical rehabilitation. These patient-reported outcomes should appropriately reflect change over time. Unfortunately, "sensitivity to change" has so far not been adequately examined for German health-related quality of life questionnaires, especially not in a comparative way. Therefore, indices of sensitivity to change for three widespread generic assessment tools have been determined IRES-3, SF-36, scales of the SCL-90-R.

METHODS:

A prospective comparative study was conducted in n = 1145 inpatients with orthopaedic/rheumatologic and cardiac diseases from 16 rehabilitation clinics. All patients received usual care. Their subjective health-status was assessed at two to four weeks before admission (t0), admission (t1), discharge (t2), and three months after discharge (t3). At each time point, they completed the IRES-3, SF-36, and relevant scales of the SCL-90-R. For the time interval t1-t2, Guyatt's responsiveness index (GRI) was calculated and compared across scales and instruments.

RESULTS:

Virtually all GRI coefficients for scales and aggregated scores, respectively, reached statistical significance. With respect to the GRI distributions of the diagnostic groups, most coefficients were located in a middle to upper range. While the results for the scales do not clearly indicate which assessment instrument should be preferred, GRI coefficients for higher aggregated scores suggest the IRES-3 to be most sensitive to change.

CONCLUSION:

These results can be helpful in selecting a health-related quality of life instrument or certain subscales for evaluation studies in the field of medical rehabilitation.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychometrics / Quality of Life / Surveys and Questionnaires / Health Status Indicators Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: De Journal: Rehabilitation (Stuttg) Year: 2006 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychometrics / Quality of Life / Surveys and Questionnaires / Health Status Indicators Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: De Journal: Rehabilitation (Stuttg) Year: 2006 Document type: Article