Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anaphylaxis to gadobenate dimeglumine (Multihance): a case report.
Kalogeromitros, Dimitrios C; Makris, Michael P; Aggelides, Xenophon S; Spanoudaki, Nektaria; Gregoriou, Stamatios G; Avgerinou, Georgia; Rigopoulos, Dimitrios G.
Affiliation
  • Kalogeromitros DC; Allergy Unit, Attikon Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece. mak-mik@hol.gr
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 144(2): 150-4, 2007.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17536224
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gadolinium chelates are relatively safe contrast media used in MRI. Immediate severe adverse effects are exceptionally rare and mostly concern mild anaphylactoid reactions. We report a case of anaphylaxis to gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA, Multihance), a gadolinium-based contrast agent.

METHODS:

A 32-year-old female patient with a personal history of multiple sclerosis, while undergoing an MRI scan, developed bronchospasm and acute urticaria with diffuse giant pruritic plaques in the first minute of Gd-BOPTA infusion. The procedure was cancelled and acute treatment of the reaction took place. The patient reported 2 additional MRI scans with definite use of unknown contrast media in the past 2 years without any adverse effect. Blood samples were obtained 2 and 48 h after the reaction for measurement of serum tryptase concentration (Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden). Skin prick tests and intradermal tests were performed using 11,000, 1100 and 110 dilution of the offending agent and alternative gadolinium-based agents [gadodiamide (Omniscan) and gadoteric acid (Dotarem)]. A group of 10 nonatopic individuals who underwent the same skin testing comprised the control group.

RESULTS:

Tryptase concentration was highly elevated 2 h after the reaction (21 microg/l) compared with that at 48 h (3 microg/l). Skin prick tests in our patient were all negative, while intradermal testing with 0.03 ml of 1100 and 110 preparations of Multihance showed a definite positive wheal-and-flare reaction. Skin tests to the alternative agents showed no response. In the control group, all performed tests were negative.

CONCLUSION:

We report the first case of an allergic reaction to gadobenate dimeglumine. Besides, skin testing seems to be a precious diagnostic tool which, if positive, strongly suggests a mast cell-mediated underlying mechanism.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Organometallic Compounds / Contrast Media / Anaphylaxis / Meglumine Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Int Arch Allergy Immunol Journal subject: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Year: 2007 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Greece
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Organometallic Compounds / Contrast Media / Anaphylaxis / Meglumine Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Int Arch Allergy Immunol Journal subject: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Year: 2007 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Greece