Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Diprivan versus midazolam in combined anaesthesia with ketamin for minor gynecological surgery].
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) ; 46(3): 41-3, 2007.
Article in Bg | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18018782
ABSTRACT
We tested the hypothesis that diprivan/ketamine (D/K) anesthesia would offer advantages compared to midazolam/ketamine (M/K) in patients undergoing minor gynecological surgery. After patient written consent, 60 healthy women, which were scheduled for elective termination of pregnancy were randomly allocated into two groups. Operating conditions, recovery, pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and patient's satisfaction to anesthesia were assessed. Demographic and surgical data were identical in the groups. Immediate recovery was faster with patients given diprivan than midazolam. Patients receiving M/K experienced more PONV in recovery room. D/K is preferable method of anesthesia for ultra-short gynecological procedure compared to M/K because of faster recovery and decreased incidence of PONV.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Midazolam / Propofol / Abortion, Induced / Anesthetics, Intravenous / Anesthesia / Ketamine Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: Bg Journal: Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) Year: 2007 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Midazolam / Propofol / Abortion, Induced / Anesthetics, Intravenous / Anesthesia / Ketamine Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: Bg Journal: Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) Year: 2007 Document type: Article