Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of placement methods using a two-in-one dentin pin.
Healey, D L; Chandler, N P.
Affiliation
  • Healey DL; University of Otago, School of Dentistry, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Prosthet Dent ; 66(6): 727-9, 1991 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1805018
ABSTRACT
Experiments were performed to determine the effect of pin channel preparation with standard and reduction speed handpieces, and pin seating by hand and with motor drive. The greatest retention was achieved by preparation with a standard handpiece at 6000 rpm, and manual pin placement with a hand driver. The most consistent retention values were achieved using the reduction handpiece. All preparation and placement combinations examined produced a clinically acceptable result.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dental Cavity Preparation / Dental Pins Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Prosthet Dent Year: 1991 Document type: Article Affiliation country: New Zealand
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dental Cavity Preparation / Dental Pins Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Prosthet Dent Year: 1991 Document type: Article Affiliation country: New Zealand