DMIST results: technologic or observer variability?

Kopans, Daniel B; Pisano, Etta D; Acharyya, Suddhasatta; Hendrick, R Edward; Yaffe, Martin J; Conant, Emily F; Fajardo, Laurie L; Bassett, Lawrence W; Baum, Janet K; Gatsonis, Constantine A

Kopans, Daniel B; Pisano, Etta D; Acharyya, Suddhasatta; Hendrick, R Edward; Yaffe, Martin J; Conant, Emily F; Fajardo, Laurie L; Bassett, Lawrence W; Baum, Janet K; Gatsonis, Constantine A.

Radiology ; 248(2): 703; author reply 703, 2008 Aug.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18641262

Subject(s)

Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging; Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology; Mammography/statistics & numerical data; Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data; Radiographic Image Enhancement; X-Ray Film/statistics & numerical data; Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Canada/epidemiology; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; United States/epidemiology

Fulltext

Add to My VHL

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: X-Ray Film / Breast Neoplasms / Mammography / Radiographic Image Enhancement / Mass Screening Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Radiology Year: 2008 Document type: Article

Fulltext

Add to My VHL

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google